Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETGAX
CMBFX vs ETGAX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETGAX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.19M
Eaton Vance GA Municipal Income A
Price$8.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.19M
CMBFX vs ETGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETGAX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. ETGAX (122M). ETGAX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETGAX (3.28) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETGAX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETGAX (32 years). ETGAX (0.71) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ETGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETGAX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. ETGAX (1.40). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. ETGAX (0.53).
| CMBFX | ETGAX | CMBFX / ETGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.71 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.71 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.745 | 2.085 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 122M | 239% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 3.28 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 1.40 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.23 | 9.55 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | 0.53 | 445% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.73 | 6.48 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement