Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETGAX
CMBFX vs ETGAX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETGAX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.19M
Eaton Vance GA Municipal Income A
Price$8.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.57M
CMBFX vs ETGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETGAX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. ETGAX (126M). ETGAX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETGAX (2.94) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETGAX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETGAX (32 years). ETGAX (0.71) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ETGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETGAX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.78 vs. ETGAX (2.26). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.04 vs. ETGAX (1.25).
| CMBFX | ETGAX | CMBFX / ETGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.71 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.71 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.136 | 2.466 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 126M | 233% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.94 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.78 | 2.26 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.30 | 12.21 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.04 | 1.25 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.78 | 6.01 | 263% |