Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETMOX
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETMOX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.27M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.32M
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETMOX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. ETMOX (90.3M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETMOX (3.16) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETMOX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETMOX (32 years). ETMOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ETMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.87 vs. ETMOX (2.54). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.13 vs. ETMOX (0.16).
| CMBFX | ETMOX | CMBFX / ETMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.71 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.71 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.224 | 2.954 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 90.3M | 324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.16 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.87 | 2.54 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.39 | 12.33 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.13 | 0.16 | 1,923% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.88 | 4.46 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers