Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETMOX
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETMOX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.19M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.85M
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETMOX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. ETMOX (85.9M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETMOX (3.53) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETMOX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETMOX (32 years). ETMOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ETMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. ETMOX (1.78). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. ETMOX (-0.70).
| CMBFX | ETMOX | CMBFX / ETMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.71 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.71 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.745 | 2.597 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 85.9M | 340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 3.53 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 1.78 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.23 | 9.60 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | -0.70 | -334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.73 | 4.76 | 351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement