Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETMOX
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETMOX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.82M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.44
Change+$0.02 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.05M
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETMOX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 286M vs. ETMOX (84.1M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETMOX (3.56) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETMOX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETMOX (32 years). ETMOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ETMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.48 vs. ETMOX (-0.92). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. ETMOX (-4.39).
| CMBFX | ETMOX | CMBFX / ETMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.71 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.71 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.941 | -0.194 | -484% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 84.1M | 340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 3.56 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | -0.92 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.67 | 3.03 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.07 | -4.39 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.50 | 1.80 | 805% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement