Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETMOX
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETMOX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.56M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.24M
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETMOX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. ETMOX (92.2M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETMOX (3.40) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETMOX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETMOX (32 years). ETMOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ETMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. ETMOX (3.00). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.86 vs. ETMOX (-0.34).
| CMBFX | ETMOX | CMBFX / ETMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.71 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.71 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.796 | 3.712 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 92.2M | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.40 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 3.00 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.13 | 11.18 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.86 | -0.34 | -841% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.70 | 5.01 | 333% |