Ad is loading...
CMBFX vs ETMOX
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETMOX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.97M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.95M
CMBFX vs ETMOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETMOX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 288M vs. ETMOX (83M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETMOX (3.52) vs CMBFX (2.42). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETMOX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETMOX (31 years). ETMOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ETMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. ETMOX (1.00). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.41 vs. ETMOX (-1.65).
| CMBFX | ETMOX | CMBFX / ETMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.71 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.71 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.792 | -1.841 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288M | 83M | 347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 3.52 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | 1.00 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.84 | 2.36 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.41 | -1.65 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.11 | -0.82 | -1,598% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers