Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs NOAZX
CMBFX vs NOAZX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs NOAZX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.38
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.23M
Northern AZ Tax-Exempt
Price$9.33
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.28M
CMBFX vs NOAZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. NOAZX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and NOAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 290M vs. NOAZX (51.3M). NOAZX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: NOAZX (3.48) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than NOAZX: CMBFX (41 years) vs NOAZX (26 years). NOAZX (0.67) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). CMBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. NOAZX (5.51). CMBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NOAZX: CMBFX (2000) vs NOAZX (2500). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. NOAZX (0.66). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.62 vs. NOAZX (-0.57).
| CMBFX | NOAZX | CMBFX / NOAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.48 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.67 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.151 | -1.428 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 290M | 51.3M | 565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.48 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | 0.66 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.62 | 6.98 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.62 | -0.57 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.57 | 13.70 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers