Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs NOAZX
CMBFX vs NOAZX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs NOAZX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287M
Northern AZ Tax-Exempt
Price$9.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.96M
CMBFX vs NOAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. NOAZX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and NOAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. NOAZX (51M). NOAZX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: NOAZX (3.50) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than NOAZX: CMBFX (41 years) vs NOAZX (26 years). NOAZX (0.67) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). NOAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.27 vs. CMBFX (13.00). CMBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NOAZX: CMBFX (2000) vs NOAZX (2500). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.40 vs. NOAZX (-0.39). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.77 vs. NOAZX (-1.32).
| CMBFX | NOAZX | CMBFX / NOAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.48 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.67 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.157 | -1.585 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 51M | 563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.50 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.40 | -0.39 | -359% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.67 | 6.87 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.77 | -1.32 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.63 | 13.20 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement