Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs NTFIX
CMBFX vs NTFIX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs NTFIX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.5M
Dupree NC Tax-Free Income
Price$10.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.52M
CMBFX vs NTFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. NTFIX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and NTFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. NTFIX (107M). NTFIX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: NTFIX (2.89) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than NTFIX: CMBFX (41 years) vs NTFIX (30 years). NTFIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). NTFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.38 vs. CMBFX (12.00). NTFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: NTFIX (500) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.41 vs. NTFIX (2.59). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.95 vs. NTFIX (0.88).
| CMBFX | NTFIX | CMBFX / NTFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.76 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.76 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.885 | 3.549 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 107M | 278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.41 | 2.59 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.74 | 9.91 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.95 | 0.88 | 337% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.34 | 18.34 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement