Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs NTFIX
CMBFX vs NTFIX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs NTFIX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293M
Dupree NC Tax-Free Income
Price$10.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.99M
CMBFX vs NTFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. NTFIX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and NTFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. NTFIX (108M). NTFIX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: NTFIX (2.91) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than NTFIX: CMBFX (41 years) vs NTFIX (30 years). NTFIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). CMBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. NTFIX (11.99). NTFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: NTFIX (500) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. NTFIX (1.39). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. NTFIX (0.45).
| CMBFX | NTFIX | CMBFX / NTFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.76 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.76 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.745 | 1.984 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 108M | 271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.91 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 1.39 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.52 | 9.72 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | 0.45 | 522% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.26 | 18.13 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement