Ad is loading...
CMBFX vs UTACX
CMBFX vs UTACX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs UTACX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.97M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.52M
CMBFX vs UTACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. UTACX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and UTACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 288M vs. UTACX (199M). UTACX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: UTACX (2.66) vs CMBFX (2.42). CMBFX was incepted earlier than UTACX: CMBFX (41 years) vs UTACX (29 years). UTACX (1.54) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). UTACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). UTACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: UTACX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. UTACX (0.52). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.41 vs. UTACX (-2.68).
| CMBFX | UTACX | CMBFX / UTACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.10 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.54 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.792 | -1.227 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288M | 199M | 145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 2.66 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | 0.52 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.84 | 2.12 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.41 | -2.68 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.11 | 4.50 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers