Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs UTAHX
CMBFX vs UTAHX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs UTAHX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.14M
CMBFX vs UTAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. UTAHX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and UTAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. UTAHX (189M). UTAHX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: UTAHX (3.54) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than UTAHX: CMBFX (41 years) vs UTAHX (33 years). UTAHX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). UTAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). UTAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: UTAHX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). UTAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.20 vs. CMBFX (2.06). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. UTAHX (1.10).
| CMBFX | UTAHX | CMBFX / UTAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.90 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.96 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.745 | 2.704 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 189M | 155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 3.54 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 2.20 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.52 | 9.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | 1.10 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.26 | 16.84 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers