Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs UTAHX
CMBFX vs UTAHX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs UTAHX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.56M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.43M
CMBFX vs UTAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. UTAHX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and UTAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. UTAHX (194M). UTAHX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: UTAHX (3.51) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than UTAHX: CMBFX (41 years) vs UTAHX (33 years). UTAHX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). UTAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). UTAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: UTAHX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). UTAHX (3.64) and CMBFX (3.50) have marching annual gain over last year. CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.86 vs. UTAHX (1.84).
| CMBFX | UTAHX | CMBFX / UTAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.90 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.96 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.796 | 3.986 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 194M | 153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.51 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 3.64 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.13 | 10.16 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.86 | 1.84 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.70 | 17.73 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers