Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs UTAYX
CMBFX vs UTAYX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs UTAYX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.97M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.44
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.56M
CMBFX vs UTAYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. UTAYX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and UTAYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. UTAYX (199M). UTAYX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: UTAYX (3.57) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than UTAYX: CMBFX (41 years) vs UTAYX (29 years). UTAYX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). UTAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). UTAYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: UTAYX (0) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.40 vs. UTAYX (1.32). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.69 vs. UTAYX (-0.27).
| CMBFX | UTAYX | CMBFX / UTAYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.55 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.75 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.157 | -0.152 | -103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 199M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.57 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.40 | 1.32 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.67 | 6.50 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.69 | -0.27 | -260% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.72 | 15.85 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers