Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs UTAYX
CMBFX vs UTAYX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs UTAYX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.14M
CMBFX vs UTAYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. UTAYX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and UTAYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. UTAYX (189M). UTAYX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: UTAYX (3.78) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than UTAYX: CMBFX (41 years) vs UTAYX (29 years). UTAYX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). UTAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). UTAYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: UTAYX (0) vs CMBFX (2000). UTAYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.45 vs. CMBFX (2.06). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. UTAYX (2.20).
| CMBFX | UTAYX | CMBFX / UTAYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.55 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.75 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.745 | 2.965 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 189M | 155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 3.78 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 2.45 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.52 | 10.13 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | 2.20 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.26 | 19.24 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement