Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs VMTTX
CMBFX vs VMTTX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs VMTTX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293M
Viking Tax-Free for Montana A
Price$9.01
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.96M
CMBFX vs VMTTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. VMTTX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and VMTTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. VMTTX (55M). VMTTX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: VMTTX (3.04) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than VMTTX: CMBFX (41 years) vs VMTTX (26 years). VMTTX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). VMTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.96 vs. CMBFX (13.00). VMTTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: VMTTX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. VMTTX (0.69). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. VMTTX (-1.57).
| CMBFX | VMTTX | CMBFX / VMTTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.98 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.17 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.745 | 1.506 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 55M | 533% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 3.04 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 0.69 | 299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.52 | 6.92 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | -1.57 | -149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.26 | 11.36 | 143% |