CMBNF
Price
$91.31
Change
+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.35B
LLAZF
Price
$69.95
Change
+$0.81 (+1.17%)
Updated
May 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.9B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMBNF vs LLAZF

Header iconCMBNF vs LLAZF Comparison
Open Charts CMBNF vs LLAZFBanner chart's image
CEMBRA MONEY BK AG
Price$91.31
Change+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Volume$170
Capitalization3.35B
Liechtensteinische Landesbank Ag Vaduz
Price$69.95
Change+$0.81 (+1.17%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.9B
CMBNF vs LLAZF Comparison Chart in %
CMBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBNF vs. LLAZF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBNF is a Hold and LLAZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMBNF: $91.31 vs. LLAZF: $69.95)
Brand notoriety: CMBNF and LLAZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBNF: 100% vs. LLAZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CMBNF: $3.35B vs. LLAZF: $2.9B
CMBNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.35B. LLAZF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLLAZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LLAZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMBNF is a better buy in the long-term than LLAZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMBNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

CMBNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LLAZF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBNF($3.35B) has a higher market cap than LLAZF($2.9B). CMBNF has higher P/E ratio than LLAZF: CMBNF (14.94) vs LLAZF (11.17). CMBNF (0.000) and LLAZF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . CMBNF has less debt than LLAZF: CMBNF (2.76B) vs LLAZF (3.35B). LLAZF has higher revenues than CMBNF: LLAZF (593M) vs CMBNF (550M).
CMBNFLLAZFCMBNF / LLAZF
Capitalization3.35B2.9B115%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio14.9411.17134%
Revenue550M593M93%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.76B3.35B82%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDC53.330.31
+0.58%
Direxion Daily MSCI Em Mkts Bull 3X ETF
HYMB24.890.02
+0.08%
SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Muncpl Bd ETF
LOCT23.820.01
+0.04%
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Oct
NUMG49.24-0.02
-0.03%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
PANG16.35-0.37
-2.23%
Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF

CMBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBNF has been loosely correlated with BLMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBNF jumps, then BLMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBNF
1D Price
Change %
CMBNF100%
N/A
BLMIF - CMBNF
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
STBK - CMBNF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CBWA - CMBNF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
CNBB - CMBNF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALBKY - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
More

LLAZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LLAZF has been loosely correlated with HMLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LLAZF jumps, then HMLN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LLAZF
1D Price
Change %
LLAZF100%
N/A
HMLN - LLAZF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OAKV - LLAZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNKB - LLAZF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
CMBNF - LLAZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWBK - LLAZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More