CMBNF
Price
$91.31
Change
+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
LOGN
Price
$29.50
Change
-$0.49 (-1.63%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMBNF vs LOGN

Header iconCMBNF vs LOGN Comparison
Open Charts CMBNF vs LOGNBanner chart's image
CEMBRA MONEY BK AG
Price$91.31
Change+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Volume$170
CapitalizationN/A
Logansport Financial
Price$29.50
Change-$0.49 (-1.63%)
Volume$285
CapitalizationN/A
CMBNF vs LOGN Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBNF vs. LOGN commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBNF is a Buy and LOGN is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CMBNF: $91.31 vs. LOGN: $29.50)
Brand notoriety: CMBNF and LOGN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBNF: 11% vs. LOGN: 71%
Market capitalization -- CMBNF: $2.23B vs. LOGN: $20.66M
CMBNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.23B. LOGN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $20.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLOGN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LOGN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMBNF is a better buy in the long-term than LOGN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOGN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LOGN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CMBNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LOGN (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOGN is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBNF($2.23B) has a higher market cap than LOGN($20.7M). CMBNF has higher P/E ratio than LOGN: CMBNF (11.79) vs LOGN (6.53). CMBNF YTD gains are higher at: 38.348 vs. LOGN (2.706). LOGN has less debt than CMBNF: LOGN (31.6M) vs CMBNF (3.1B). CMBNF has higher revenues than LOGN: CMBNF (512M) vs LOGN (9.74M).
CMBNFLOGNCMBNF / LOGN
Capitalization2.23B20.7M10,754%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.3482.7061,417%
P/E Ratio11.796.53181%
Revenue512M9.74M5,257%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.1B31.6M9,810%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOGN: Fundamental Ratings
LOGN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBNFLOGN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LOGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBTIX32.950.28
+0.86%
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology I
RYHEX36.820.01
+0.03%
Rydex Health Care A
RWIIX14.56N/A
N/A
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical Intl I
UANQX54.22N/A
N/A
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index Class A
IPEAX5.98-0.02
-0.33%
Voya Large Cap Value Port A

CMBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBNF has been loosely correlated with BLMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBNF jumps, then BLMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBNF
1D Price
Change %
CMBNF100%
N/A
BLMIF - CMBNF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STBK - CMBNF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
CBWA - CMBNF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - CMBNF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALBKY - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More

LOGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LOGN and WVFC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LOGN and WVFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOGN
1D Price
Change %
LOGN100%
N/A
WVFC - LOGN
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
KGTFF - LOGN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZNL - LOGN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
BDGSF - LOGN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMBNF - LOGN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More