CMC
Price
$48.51
Change
+$0.07 (+0.14%)
Updated
Mar 3, 12:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.5B
17 days until earnings call
SZGPY
Price
$2.03
Change
-$0.02 (-0.98%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
Ad is loading...

CMC vs SZGPY

Header iconCMC vs SZGPY Comparison
Open Charts CMC vs SZGPYBanner chart's image
Commercial Metals
Price$48.51
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
Volume$323
Capitalization5.5B
Salzgitter AG
Price$2.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.98%)
Volume$117
Capitalization1.1B
CMC vs SZGPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMC vs. SZGPY commentary
Mar 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMC is a Hold and SZGPY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CMC: $48.44 vs. SZGPY: $2.03)
Brand notoriety: CMC and SZGPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMC: 164% vs. SZGPY: 4%
Market capitalization -- CMC: $5.5B vs. SZGPY: $1.1B
CMC [@Steel] is valued at $5.5B. SZGPY’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $31.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSZGPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SZGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMC and SZGPY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CMC (@Steel) experienced а -2.69% price change this week, while SZGPY (@Steel) price change was +4.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMC is expected to report earnings on Jun 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-0.51% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMC($5.51B) has a higher market cap than SZGPY($1.1B). CMC (43.64) and SZGPY (42.91) have similar P/E ratio . SZGPY YTD gains are higher at: 28.844 vs. CMC (-1.997). CMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 509M vs. SZGPY (462M). CMC has more cash in the bank: 856M vs. SZGPY (582M). SZGPY has higher revenues than CMC: SZGPY (10.1B) vs CMC (7.83B).
CMCSZGPYCMC / SZGPY
Capitalization5.51B1.1B500%
EBITDA509M462M110%
Gain YTD-1.99728.844-7%
P/E Ratio43.6442.91102%
Revenue7.83B10.1B78%
Total Cash856M582M147%
Total Debt1.19BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMC vs SZGPY: Fundamental Ratings
CMC
SZGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1783
SMR RATING
1..100
8286
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SZGPY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as CMC (16) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for SZGPY (83) in the null industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew significantly faster than SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's SMR Rating (82) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as SZGPY (86) in the null industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew similarly to SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CMC (76) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CMC (2) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBDC36.170.56
+1.57%
Putnam BDC Income ETF
GRPM107.850.87
+0.81%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
QAT18.000.14
+0.78%
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
NVG12.910.05
+0.39%
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund
UTRE49.460.11
+0.23%
US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF

SZGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZGPY has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SZGPY jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZGPY
1D Price
Change %
SZGPY100%
-1.04%
NUE - SZGPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
CMC - SZGPY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
MT - SZGPY
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
GGB - SZGPY
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
CLF - SZGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More