CMCLF
Price
$1.65
Change
+$0.04 (+2.50%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
38.11B
CPPMF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
30.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMCLF vs CPPMF

Header iconCMCLF vs CPPMF Comparison
Open Charts CMCLF vs CPPMFBanner chart's image
CMOC GROUP
Price$1.65
Change+$0.04 (+2.50%)
Volume$4.18K
Capitalization38.11B
Coppernico Metals
Price$0.17
Change+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Volume$300.36K
Capitalization30.16M
CMCLF vs CPPMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMCLF vs. CPPMF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCLF is a StrongBuy and CPPMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CMCLF: $1.64 vs. CPPMF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: CMCLF and CPPMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMCLF: 30% vs. CPPMF: 409%
Market capitalization -- CMCLF: $38.11B vs. CPPMF: $30.16M
CMCLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $38.11B. CPPMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $30.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMCLF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCPPMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMCLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CPPMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMCLF is a better buy in the long-term than CPPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMCLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPPMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMCLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CPPMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPPMF is a better buy in the short-term than CMCLF.

Price Growth

CMCLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +13.84% price change this week, while CPPMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +39.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMCLF($38.1B) has a higher market cap than CPPMF($30.2M). CMCLF YTD gains are higher at: 160.202 vs. CPPMF (-2.669). CMCLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. CPPMF (-11.21M). CMCLF has more cash in the bank: 49.3B vs. CPPMF (8.09M). CMCLF has higher revenues than CPPMF: CMCLF (202B) vs CPPMF (0).
CMCLFCPPMFCMCLF / CPPMF
Capitalization38.1B30.2M126,159%
EBITDA30.7B-11.21M-273,978%
Gain YTD160.202-2.669-6,002%
P/E Ratio14.87N/A-
Revenue202B0-
Total Cash49.3B8.09M609,394%
Total Debt53.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCLF vs CPPMF: Fundamental Ratings
CMCLF
CPPMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
4198
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1314
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMCLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPPMF (64). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPPMF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPPMF (100). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPPMF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPPMF (98). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPPMF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CPPMF (40). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew similarly to CPPMF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as CPPMF (14). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew similarly to CPPMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCLFCPPMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRTC16.230.37
+2.33%
PureTech Health plc
PETS3.050.01
+0.33%
PetMed Express
DDT26.060.07
+0.27%
Dillard's Capital Trust I
WTS280.310.60
+0.21%
Watts Water Technologies
NTCT24.86-0.19
-0.76%
NetScout Systems

CMCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMCLF and CNIKF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMCLF and CNIKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCLF
1D Price
Change %
CMCLF100%
+2.81%
CNIKF - CMCLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+9.19%
CLLXF - CMCLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRECF - CMCLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.25%
CPPMF - CMCLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+5.17%
CSRNF - CMCLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+10.70%
More