CMCLF
Price
$1.71
Change
+$0.01 (+0.59%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
41.03B
CSRNF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMCLF vs CSRNF

Header iconCMCLF vs CSRNF Comparison
Open Charts CMCLF vs CSRNFBanner chart's image
CMOC GROUP
Price$1.71
Change+$0.01 (+0.59%)
Volume$28.9K
Capitalization41.03B
Canstar Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization7.5M
CMCLF vs CSRNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMCLF vs. CSRNF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCLF is a StrongBuy and CSRNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CMCLF: $1.71 vs. CSRNF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CMCLF and CSRNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMCLF: 183% vs. CSRNF: 158%
Market capitalization -- CMCLF: $41.03B vs. CSRNF: $7.5M
CMCLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $41.03B. CSRNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMCLF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCSRNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMCLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CSRNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMCLF is a better buy in the long-term than CSRNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMCLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSRNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMCLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CSRNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMCLF and CSRNF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMCLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.33% price change this week, while CSRNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +320.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMCLF($41B) has a higher market cap than CSRNF($7.5M). CMCLF YTD gains are higher at: 169.693 vs. CSRNF (118.000). CMCLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.1B vs. CSRNF (-1.23M). CMCLF has more cash in the bank: 40.2B vs. CSRNF (168K). CMCLF has higher revenues than CSRNF: CMCLF (205B) vs CSRNF (0).
CMCLFCSRNFCMCLF / CSRNF
Capitalization41B7.5M546,885%
EBITDA39.1B-1.23M-3,170,636%
Gain YTD169.693118.000144%
P/E Ratio15.39N/A-
Revenue205B0-
Total Cash40.2B168K23,928,571%
Total Debt29BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCLF vs CSRNF: Fundamental Ratings
CMCLF
CSRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3185

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMCLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSRNF (81). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSRNF (100). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CSRNF (100). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew similarly to CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CSRNF (40). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew similarly to CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSRNF (100). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCLFCSRNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIOA5.420.20
+3.83%
BioAge Labs Inc.
BATL1.240.04
+3.33%
Battalion Oil Corp
KNF73.581.54
+2.14%
Knife River Corp
NBN102.65-0.53
-0.51%
Northeast Bank
HMC33.11-0.29
-0.87%
Honda Motor Co Ltd

CMCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMCLF and CNIKF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMCLF and CNIKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCLF
1D Price
Change %
CMCLF100%
+0.29%
CNIKF - CMCLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
CRECF - CMCLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.65%
CPPMF - CMCLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
CSRNF - CMCLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMRZF - CMCLF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%

CSRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSRNF and FPRGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSRNF and FPRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSRNF
1D Price
Change %
CSRNF100%
N/A
FPRGF - CSRNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.70%
CRECF - CSRNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.65%
CMRZF - CSRNF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
CNIKF - CSRNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
CMCLF - CSRNF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More