CMCSA
Price
$35.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
167.85B
62 days until earnings call
FYBR
Price
$36.64
Change
-$0.13 (-0.35%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.02B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMCSA vs FYBR

Header iconCMCSA vs FYBR Comparison
Open Charts CMCSA vs FYBRBanner chart's image
Comcast
Price$35.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.14K
Capitalization167.85B
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$36.64
Change-$0.13 (-0.35%)
Volume$30.28K
Capitalization6.02B
CMCSA vs FYBR Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMCSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMCSA vs. FYBR commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCSA is a Hold and FYBR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CMCSA: $35.10 vs. FYBR: $36.77)
Brand notoriety: CMCSA: Notable vs. FYBR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMCSA: 0% vs. FYBR: 116%
Market capitalization -- CMCSA: $167.85B vs. FYBR: $6.02B
CMCSA [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $167.85B. FYBR’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMCSA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFYBR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMCSA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FYBR is a better buy in the long-term than CMCSA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMCSA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FYBR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMCSA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FYBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMCSA and FYBR are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMCSA (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -0.65% price change this week, while FYBR (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +53.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMCSA is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+2.93% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMCSA($168B) has a higher market cap than FYBR($6.02B). FYBR has higher P/E ratio than CMCSA: FYBR (199.42) vs CMCSA (11.39). FYBR YTD gains are higher at: 5.965 vs. CMCSA (-4.833). CMCSA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.9B vs. FYBR (2.19B). CMCSA has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. FYBR (2.2B). FYBR has less debt than CMCSA: FYBR (11.3B) vs CMCSA (97.1B). CMCSA has higher revenues than FYBR: CMCSA (122B) vs FYBR (5.68B).
CMCSAFYBRCMCSA / FYBR
Capitalization168B6.02B2,789%
EBITDA38.9B2.19B1,780%
Gain YTD-4.8335.965-81%
P/E Ratio11.39199.426%
Revenue122B5.68B2,149%
Total Cash6.22B2.2B283%
Total Debt97.1B11.3B859%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCSA: Fundamental Ratings
CMCSA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCSAFYBR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMCSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMND30.911.82
+6.26%
Lemonade
CRVL114.592.29
+2.04%
CorVel Corp
UAMY2.50N/A
N/A
United States Antimony Corp
ARGX584.95N/A
N/A
argenx SE
TCBX30.83N/A
N/A
Third Coast Bancshares

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
-0.16%
S - FYBR
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.43%
CHTR - FYBR
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
CMCSA - FYBR
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
ASTS - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.79%
USM - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
More