CMDXF
Price
$4.63
Change
+$0.08 (+1.76%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
376.57M
CNSWF
Price
$3176.14
Change
+$46.16 (+1.47%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
66.27B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMDXF vs CNSWF

Header iconCMDXF vs CNSWF Comparison
Open Charts CMDXF vs CNSWFBanner chart's image
Computer Modelling Group
Price$4.63
Change+$0.08 (+1.76%)
Volume$47.9K
Capitalization376.57M
Constellation Software
Price$3176.14
Change+$46.16 (+1.47%)
Volume$2.44K
Capitalization66.27B
CMDXF vs CNSWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMDXF vs. CNSWF commentary
Aug 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMDXF is a Hold and CNSWF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CMDXF: $4.53 vs. CNSWF: $3127.21)
Brand notoriety: CMDXF and CNSWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMDXF: 91% vs. CNSWF: 242%
Market capitalization -- CMDXF: $376.57M vs. CNSWF: $66.27B
CMDXF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $376.57M. CNSWF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $66.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $322.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMDXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNSWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMDXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CNSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNSWF is a better buy in the long-term than CMDXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMDXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNSWF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMDXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CNSWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMDXF is a better buy in the short-term than CNSWF.

Price Growth

CMDXF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while CNSWF (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNSWF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNSWF($66.3B) has a higher market cap than CMDXF($377M). CNSWF has higher P/E ratio than CMDXF: CNSWF (103.41) vs CMDXF (24.07). CNSWF YTD gains are higher at: 0.970 vs. CMDXF (-38.941). CNSWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.62B vs. CMDXF (41.6M). CNSWF has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. CMDXF (44M). CMDXF has less debt than CNSWF: CMDXF (38.2M) vs CNSWF (5.16B). CNSWF has higher revenues than CMDXF: CNSWF (10.7B) vs CMDXF (129M).
CMDXFCNSWFCMDXF / CNSWF
Capitalization377M66.3B1%
EBITDA41.6M2.62B2%
Gain YTD-38.9410.970-4,016%
P/E Ratio24.07103.4123%
Revenue129M10.7B1%
Total Cash44M2.58B2%
Total Debt38.2M5.16B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMDXF vs CNSWF: Fundamental Ratings
CMDXF
CNSWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
858
SMR RATING
1..100
3441
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8964
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9343
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMDXF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNSWF (85). This means that CMDXF’s stock grew significantly faster than CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMDXF (85). This means that CNSWF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMDXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMDXF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CNSWF (41). This means that CMDXF’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CMDXF (89). This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to CMDXF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMDXF (93). This means that CNSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMDXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMDXFCNSWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWBC101.22-0.93
-0.91%
East West Bancorp
PBHC14.52-0.15
-1.02%
Pathfinder Bancorp
VYNE0.33-0.01
-3.20%
VYNE Therapeutics
IBRX2.28-0.15
-6.17%
ImmunityBio
CRNC10.81-0.71
-6.20%
Cerence

CMDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMDXF has been loosely correlated with LSPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMDXF jumps, then LSPD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMDXF
1D Price
Change %
CMDXF100%
-2.16%
LSPD - CMDXF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
OTGLF - CMDXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
BKKT - CMDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.90%
CPAY - CMDXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
CNSWF - CMDXF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More

CNSWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNSWF has been loosely correlated with DSGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNSWF jumps, then DSGX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNSWF
1D Price
Change %
CNSWF100%
-1.54%
DSGX - CNSWF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
SAP - CNSWF
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
MSFT - CNSWF
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
PDFS - CNSWF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
PTC - CNSWF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More