Advertisement
CMEIF vs CZASF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMEIF is a Hold and CZASF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMEIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCZASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CMEIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- CZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CMEIF (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CZASF (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.81%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (-4.34% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| CMEIF | CZASF | CMEIF / CZASF | |
| Capitalization | 282M | 184M | 153% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.200 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 37.37 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
CZASF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CMEIF | CZASF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 7% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 2 days ago 7% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
CMEIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMEIF and CZASF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMEIF and CZASF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMEIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMEIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CZASF - CMEIF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FKRAF - CMEIF | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.01% | ||
| CDNAF - CMEIF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| VRM - CMEIF | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.35% | ||
| ANCTF - CMEIF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||
CZASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZASF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZASF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZASF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CMEIF - CZASF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DFRYF - CZASF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DUFRY - CZASF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
| DSITF - CZASF | 1% Poorly correlated | -10.58% | ||
| HNORY - CZASF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||