CMEIF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.07 (-21.88%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
CZASF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
198.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMEIF vs CZASF

Header iconCMEIF vs CZASF Comparison
Open Charts CMEIF vs CZASFBanner chart's image
China Meidong Auto
Price$0.25
Change-$0.07 (-21.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.47B
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.47K
Capitalization198.56M
CMEIF vs CZASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMEIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMEIF vs. CZASF commentary
Aug 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMEIF is a Hold and CZASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMEIF: $0.25 vs. CZASF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: CMEIF and CZASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMEIF: 99% vs. CZASF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CMEIF: $1.47B vs. CZASF: $198.56M
CMEIF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $1.47B. CZASF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $198.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMEIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCZASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMEIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMEIF is a better buy in the long-term than CZASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMEIF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMEIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CMEIF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -21.83% price change this week, while CZASF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.10% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMEIF($1.47B) has a higher market cap than CZASF($199M). CZASF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CMEIF (-16.200). CMEIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.62B vs. CZASF (-33.49M). CMEIF has more cash in the bank: 3.5B vs. CZASF (745M). CMEIF has less debt than CZASF: CMEIF (5.54B) vs CZASF (18.1B). CMEIF has higher revenues than CZASF: CMEIF (24.4B) vs CZASF (21B).
CMEIFCZASFCMEIF / CZASF
Capitalization1.47B199M739%
EBITDA1.62B-33.49M-4,840%
Gain YTD-16.2000.000-
P/E Ratio20.66N/A-
Revenue24.4B21B116%
Total Cash3.5B745M469%
Total Debt5.54B18.1B31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZASF: Fundamental Ratings
CZASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMEIFCZASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMEIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LLGLX14.34N/A
N/A
Longleaf Partners Global
RUSRX10.51N/A
N/A
Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Eq R6
SVTAX11.13N/A
N/A
SEI Global Managed Volatility F (SIMT)
OGFAX95.08N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Index R6
DDVRX14.04-0.01
-0.07%
Macquarie Value R

CMEIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMEIF and CZASF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMEIF and CZASF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMEIF
1D Price
Change %
CMEIF100%
N/A
CZASF - CMEIF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKRAF - CMEIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - CMEIF
4%
Poorly correlated
+12.56%
VRM - CMEIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
ANCTF - CMEIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More

CZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CZASF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZASF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZASF
1D Price
Change %
CZASF100%
N/A
CMEIF - CZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - CZASF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
DUFRY - CZASF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
DSITF - CZASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNORY - CZASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More