CMG
Price
$40.98
Change
+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
54.91B
21 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$105.94
Change
-$2.06 (-1.91%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
441.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs NATH

Header iconCMG vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts CMG vs NATHBanner chart's image
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$40.98
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Volume$100.63K
Capitalization54.91B
Nathan's Famous
Price$105.94
Change-$2.06 (-1.91%)
Volume$100
Capitalization441.67M
CMG vs NATH Comparison Chart in %
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMG vs. NATH commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a Hold and NATH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CMG: $40.95 vs. NATH: $108.00)
Brand notoriety: CMG: Notable vs. NATH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 80% vs. NATH: 156%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $54.91B vs. NATH: $441.67M
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $54.91B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $441.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $211.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than CMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than CMG.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.49% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.73% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($54.9B) has a higher market cap than NATH($442M). CMG has higher P/E ratio than NATH: CMG (36.24) vs NATH (18.75). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 39.359 vs. CMG (-32.090). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.35B vs. NATH (37M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. NATH (26.9M). NATH has less debt than CMG: NATH (54.9M) vs CMG (4.78B). CMG has higher revenues than NATH: CMG (11.6B) vs NATH (150M).
CMGNATHCMG / NATH
Capitalization54.9B442M12,421%
EBITDA2.35B37M6,341%
Gain YTD-32.09039.359-82%
P/E Ratio36.2418.75193%
Revenue11.6B150M7,733%
Total Cash1.55B26.9M5,747%
Total Debt4.78B54.9M8,709%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6223
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6613
SMR RATING
1..100
2240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8729
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (70) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (82). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (66). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (40). This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (64). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (87). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYCEX97.26N/A
N/A
Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy C
FGSCX28.32N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
MAGRX33.75N/A
N/A
BlackRock Natural Resources Instl
SCPAX12.01N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Disciplined Eq A (SIIT)
VLCRX5.81N/A
N/A
Voya Large Cap Value Port R6