CMHF
Price
$29.25
Change
-$0.75 (-2.50%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
87.59M
KEY
Price
$18.86
Change
+$0.15 (+0.80%)
Updated
Sep 18, 11:03 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.43B
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMHF vs KEY

Header iconCMHF vs KEY Comparison
Open Charts CMHF vs KEYBanner chart's image
Community Heritage Financial
Price$29.25
Change-$0.75 (-2.50%)
Volume$6.1K
Capitalization87.59M
Key
Price$18.86
Change+$0.15 (+0.80%)
Volume$29.18K
Capitalization20.43B
CMHF vs KEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMHF vs. KEY commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMHF is a Hold and KEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CMHF: $29.25 vs. KEY: $18.71)
Brand notoriety: CMHF: Not notable vs. KEY: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMHF: 468% vs. KEY: 98%
Market capitalization -- CMHF: $87.59M vs. KEY: $20.43B
CMHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $87.59M. KEY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $20.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKEY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KEY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMHF is a better buy in the long-term than KEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • KEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMHF and KEY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.86% price change this week, while KEY (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

KEY is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KEY($20.4B) has a higher market cap than CMHF($87.6M). KEY has higher P/E ratio than CMHF: KEY (22.04) vs CMHF (12.89). CMHF YTD gains are higher at: 23.030 vs. KEY (13.159). KEY has higher revenues than CMHF: KEY (4.94B) vs CMHF (33.6M).
CMHFKEYCMHF / KEY
Capitalization87.6M20.4B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.03013.159175%
P/E Ratio12.8922.0458%
Revenue33.6M4.94B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A14.8B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMHF vs KEY: Fundamental Ratings
CMHF
KEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2672
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4059
SMR RATING
1..100
628
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4321
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMHF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as KEY (79) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to KEY’s over the last 12 months.

CMHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as KEY (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to KEY’s over the last 12 months.

KEY's SMR Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMHF (62) in the null industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMHF’s over the last 12 months.

KEY's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMHF (43) in the null industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew similarly to CMHF’s over the last 12 months.

KEY's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMHF (11) in the null industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew similarly to CMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMHFKEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLIX60.360.22
+0.37%
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
FMUB51.090.02
+0.04%
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opports ETF
PFRL50.26-0.02
-0.05%
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
PDO13.96-0.02
-0.16%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
GVAL29.45-0.14
-0.49%
Cambria Global Value ETF

CMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMHF has been loosely correlated with CDAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMHF jumps, then CDAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMHF
1D Price
Change %
CMHF100%
-2.50%
CDAB - CMHF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CWBK - CMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KEY - CMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
BNCC - CMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
WTBFA - CMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More