Advertisement
CMHF vs KEY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMHF is a Buy and KEY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMHF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CMHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.81% price change this week, while KEY (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
KEY is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.52% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CMHF | KEY | CMHF / KEY | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 14.7B | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.427 | 4.660 | 353% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 17.60 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 6.22B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 22.6B | - |
CMHF | KEY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMHF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as KEY (73) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to KEY’s over the last 12 months.
CMHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as KEY (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to KEY’s over the last 12 months.
KEY's SMR Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMHF (61) in the null industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMHF’s over the last 12 months.
CMHF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as KEY (48) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to KEY’s over the last 12 months.
KEY's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMHF (10) in the null industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew similarly to CMHF’s over the last 12 months.
| CMHF | KEY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 31% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 51% | 16 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EETH | 64.16 | 2.07 | +3.33% |
| ProShares Ether ETF | |||
| CONY | 7.10 | 0.12 | +1.72% |
| YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| BJUL | 47.96 | 0.24 | +0.51% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF July | |||
| UJB | 77.11 | 0.13 | +0.16% |
| ProShares Ultra High Yield | |||
| IBTP | 25.67 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Trsy ETF | |||
CMHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMHF has been loosely correlated with CDAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMHF jumps, then CDAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMHF | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| CDAB - CMHF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CWBK - CMHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
| KEY - CMHF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
| BNCC - CMHF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WTBFA - CMHF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||