CMHF
Price
$28.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
81.75M
WTBFA
Price
$554.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
793.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMHF vs WTBFA

Header iconCMHF vs WTBFA Comparison
Open Charts CMHF vs WTBFABanner chart's image
Community Heritage Financial
Price$28.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization81.75M
W.T.B. Financial
Price$554.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1
Capitalization793.83M
CMHF vs WTBFA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBFA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMHF vs. WTBFA commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMHF is a Buy and WTBFA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CMHF: $28.00 vs. WTBFA: $554.00)
Brand notoriety: CMHF and WTBFA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMHF: 13% vs. WTBFA: 80%
Market capitalization -- CMHF: $81.75M vs. WTBFA: $793.83M
CMHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $81.75M. WTBFA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $793.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBFA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WTBFA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMHF is a better buy in the long-term than WTBFA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTBFA’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WTBFA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMHF is a better buy in the short-term than WTBFA.

Price Growth

CMHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WTBFA (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTBFA($794M) has a higher market cap than CMHF($81.8M). WTBFA has higher P/E ratio than CMHF: WTBFA (19.88) vs CMHF (12.33). CMHF YTD gains are higher at: 17.773 vs. WTBFA (12.678). WTBFA has higher revenues than CMHF: WTBFA (380M) vs CMHF (33.6M).
CMHFWTBFACMHF / WTBFA
Capitalization81.8M794M10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.77312.678140%
P/E Ratio12.3319.8862%
Revenue33.6M380M9%
Total CashN/A130M-
Total DebtN/A500M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMHF vs WTBFA: Fundamental Ratings
CMHF
WTBFA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3040
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4368
SMR RATING
1..100
10021
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10090
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMHF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTBFA (97). This means that CMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTBFA’s over the last 12 months.

CMHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBFA (68). This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to WTBFA’s over the last 12 months.

WTBFA's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMHF (100). This means that WTBFA’s stock grew significantly faster than CMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBFA (58). This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to WTBFA’s over the last 12 months.

WTBFA's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CMHF (100). This means that WTBFA’s stock grew similarly to CMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMHFWTBFA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
51%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBFA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSCIX14.400.09
+0.63%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities C
RYLGX114.03N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth A
EQNAX23.23N/A
N/A
MFS Equity Income A
WOFNX65.37N/A
N/A
Allspring Opportunity Inst
ADNPX20.22-0.20
-0.98%
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov Inv

CMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMHF has been loosely correlated with CDAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMHF jumps, then CDAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMHF
1D Price
Change %
CMHF100%
N/A
CDAB - CMHF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CWBK - CMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
KEY - CMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
BNCC - CMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.44%
WTBFA - CMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WTBFA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBFA has been loosely correlated with CDAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBFA jumps, then CDAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTBFA
1D Price
Change %
WTBFA100%
N/A
CDAB - WTBFA
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JTNB - WTBFA
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HARL - WTBFA
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALBKY - WTBFA
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
TMAK - WTBFA
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More