Ad is loading...
CMIDX vs PAMCX
CMIDX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts CMIDX vs PAMCX
Congress Mid Cap Growth Retail
Price$20.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets774.57M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$88.72
Change+$0.79 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.52B
CMIDX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMIDX vs. PAMCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMIDX is a Buy and PAMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. CMIDX (775M). CMIDX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMIDX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: CMIDX (13 years) vs PAMCX (25 years). CMIDX (1.05) and PAMCX (1.01) have similar cost to investors . CMIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). CMIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: CMIDX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.91 vs. CMIDX (-15.52). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.72 vs. CMIDX (1.52).
| CMIDX | PAMCX | CMIDX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.01 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.01 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.568 | -6.418 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 775M | 26.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.52 | -10.91 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.99 | 3.65 | -356% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.52 | 5.72 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.85 | 11.21 | 329% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...