Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMIDX vs PAMCX
CMIDX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts CMIDX vs PAMCX
Congress Mid Cap Growth Retail
Price$22.28
Change+$0.25 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets698.48M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$97.06
Change+$0.17 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.31B
CMIDX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMIDX vs. PAMCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMIDX is a Buy and PAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. CMIDX (698M). CMIDX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMIDX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: CMIDX (13 years) vs PAMCX (25 years). CMIDX (1.05) and PAMCX (1.01) have similar cost to investors . CMIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). CMIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: CMIDX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.63 vs. CMIDX (-10.92). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.77 vs. CMIDX (-10.67).
| CMIDX | PAMCX | CMIDX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.01 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.01 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.548 | 3.118 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 698M | 27.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.92 | -4.63 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.79 | 9.55 | -102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.67 | -1.77 | 601% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.63 | 25.78 | 200% |