Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFACX
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFACX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$49.98
Change-$0.14 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets571.29M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.04
Change-$0.24 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.28B
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. CMLIX (571M). CMLIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CMLIX (0.07) vs GFACX (0.00). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CMLIX (97 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CMLIX (0.68). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFACX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.69 vs. CMLIX (6.62). CMLIX (35.32) and GFACX (34.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CMLIX | GFACX | CMLIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 97 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.071 | 11.794 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 571M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.62 | 11.69 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.88 | 47.52 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.32 | 34.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.95 | 67.13 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement