Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFACX
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFACX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$52.16
Change+$0.29 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets585.43M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. CMLIX (585M). CMLIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CMLIX (0.07) vs GFACX (0.00). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CMLIX (98 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CMLIX (0.68). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFACX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. CMLIX (5.61). GFACX (30.41) and CMLIX (30.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CMLIX | GFACX | CMLIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.810 | 17.033 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 585M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | 9.19 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.38 | 64.43 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.07 | 30.41 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.38 | 80.29 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement