Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFACX
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFACX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$52.11
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets592.87M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.20
Change-$0.72 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. CMLIX (593M). CMLIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CMLIX (0.07) vs GFACX (0.00). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CMLIX (98 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CMLIX (0.68). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFACX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.71 vs. CMLIX (8.16). CMLIX (38.79) and GFACX (37.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CMLIX | GFACX | CMLIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.451 | 16.374 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 593M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 10.71 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.88 | 65.29 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.79 | 37.51 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.80 | 93.03 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement