Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFACX
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFACX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$51.84
Change-$0.09 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets590.45M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CMLIX (590M). CMLIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CMLIX (0.07) vs GFACX (0.00). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CMLIX (98 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CMLIX (0.68). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFACX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. CMLIX (12.02). CMLIX (33.73) and GFACX (32.72) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CMLIX | GFACX | CMLIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.938 | 15.198 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.02 | 16.14 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.75 | 53.18 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.73 | 32.72 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.91 | 79.85 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers