Ad is loading...
CMLIX vs GFAFX
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFAFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$47.56
Change-$1.03 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets554.2M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.03
Change-$1.83 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFAFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. CMLIX (554M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFAFX (0.45) vs CMLIX (0.39). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CMLIX (97 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CMLIX (22.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. CMLIX (8.12). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. CMLIX (39.67).
| CMLIX | GFAFX | CMLIX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 97 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.602 | 3.078 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 554M | 304B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.45 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | 12.28 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.15 | 23.02 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.67 | 42.32 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.68 | 72.87 | 157% |