Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFAFX
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFAFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$49.41
Change+$0.36 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.72M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$81.41
Change+$0.42 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.43B
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 319B vs. CMLIX (560M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFAFX (0.32) vs CMLIX (0.07). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CMLIX (97 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CMLIX (0.68) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. CMLIX (3.32). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.59 vs. CMLIX (44.38).
| CMLIX | GFAFX | CMLIX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 97 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.785 | 9.802 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 560M | 319B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.32 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | 10.62 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.66 | 56.48 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.38 | 54.59 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.02 | 83.65 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers