Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFAFX
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFAFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$51.84
Change-$0.09 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets590.45M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CMLIX (590M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFAFX (0.29) vs CMLIX (0.07). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CMLIX (98 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CMLIX (0.68) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.40 vs. CMLIX (12.02). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.23 vs. CMLIX (33.73).
| CMLIX | GFAFX | CMLIX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.938 | 15.754 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.29 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.02 | 18.40 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.75 | 60.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.73 | 42.23 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.91 | 99.75 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement