Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFAFX
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFAFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$47.97
Change+$0.40 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets549.43M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.80
Change+$0.75 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.78B
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. CMLIX (549M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFAFX (0.32) vs CMLIX (0.07). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CMLIX (97 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CMLIX (0.68) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. CMLIX (4.77). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.12 vs. CMLIX (38.91).
| CMLIX | GFAFX | CMLIX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 97 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.478 | 5.477 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 549M | 308B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.32 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.77 | 9.27 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 37.44 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.91 | 45.12 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.58 | 75.15 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement