Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFAFX
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFAFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$51.34
Change-$0.15 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets585.36M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFAFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. CMLIX (585M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFAFX (0.30) vs CMLIX (0.07). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CMLIX (97 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CMLIX (0.68) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.63 vs. CMLIX (8.94). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.21 vs. CMLIX (35.27).
| CMLIX | GFAFX | CMLIX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 97 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.998 | 14.262 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 585M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.30 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 14.63 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.88 | 42.59 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.27 | 44.21 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.14 | 87.27 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement