Ad is loading...
CMLIX vs GFAFX
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFAFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$46.52
Change+$1.53 (+3.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.58M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$74.61
Change+$2.74 (+3.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFAFX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. CMLIX (518M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFAFX (0.35) vs CMLIX (0.08). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CMLIX (97 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CMLIX (0.68) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.04 vs. CMLIX (0.16). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.84 vs. CMLIX (43.55).
| CMLIX | GFAFX | CMLIX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 97 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.888 | -2.562 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 518M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.35 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | 3.04 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.32 | 30.84 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.55 | 47.84 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.23 | 59.84 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...