Ad is loading...
CMLIX vs GFAFX
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFAFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$42.24
Change+$0.78 (+1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.81M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.54
Change+$1.04 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. CMLIX (479M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFAFX (0.35) vs CMLIX (0.08). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CMLIX (97 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CMLIX (0.68) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.32 vs. CMLIX (-7.14). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. CMLIX (39.63).
| CMLIX | GFAFX | CMLIX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 97 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.429 | -9.789 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 479M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.35 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | -5.32 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.51 | 6.81 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.63 | 47.17 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.60 | 50.37 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...