Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs PSCIX
CMNIX vs PSCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. PSCIX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Buy and PSCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. PSCIX (299M). PSCIX pays higher dividends than CMNIX: PSCIX (4.50) vs CMNIX (1.92). CMNIX was incepted earlier than PSCIX: CMNIX (25 years) vs PSCIX (13 years). PSCIX (1.88) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (0.97). PSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. CMNIX (35.00). PSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMNIX: PSCIX (100000) vs CMNIX (1000000). PSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.36 vs. CMNIX (7.49). CMNIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.71 vs. PSCIX (18.74).
| CMNIX | PSCIX | CMNIX / PSCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.28 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.88 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.714 | 3.582 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.2B | 299M | 5,418% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 4.50 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | 9.36 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.38 | 24.47 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.71 | 18.74 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.63 | 35.04 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers