Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs WMNAX
CMNIX vs WMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. WMNAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Hold and WMNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. WMNAX (129M). WMNAX pays higher dividends than CMNIX: WMNAX (2.23) vs CMNIX (1.86). CMNIX was incepted earlier than WMNAX: CMNIX (25 years) vs WMNAX (6 years). WMNAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (0.97). WMNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CMNIX (35.00). WMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMNIX: WMNAX (1000) vs CMNIX (1000000). CMNIX (7.21) and WMNAX (7.09) have marching annual gain over last year. WMNAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.71 vs. CMNIX (21.15).
| CMNIX | WMNAX | CMNIX / WMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.10 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.33 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.786 | 6.586 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 129M | 13,101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.23 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 7.09 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | 22.30 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.15 | 23.71 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement