Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs WMNUX
CMNIX vs WMNUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. WMNUX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Hold and WMNUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. WMNUX (129M). WMNUX pays higher dividends than CMNIX: WMNUX (2.46) vs CMNIX (1.86). CMNIX was incepted earlier than WMNUX: CMNIX (25 years) vs WMNUX (10 years). WMNUX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (0.97). WMNUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CMNIX (35.00). CMNIX (1000000) and WMNUX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WMNUX (7.34) and CMNIX (7.21) have marching annual gain over last year. WMNUX return over 5 years is better than : 25.23 vs. CMNIX (21.15).
| CMNIX | WMNUX | CMNIX / WMNUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.85 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.08 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.786 | 6.653 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 129M | 13,101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.46 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 7.34 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | 23.09 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.15 | 25.23 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.35 | 41.41 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement