CMPGF
Price
$34.37
Change
+$0.25 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
56.88B
DIN
Price
$24.36
Change
-$1.42 (-5.51%)
Updated
Jun 27, 02:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
395.18M
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGF vs DIN

Header iconCMPGF vs DIN Comparison
Open Charts CMPGF vs DINBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$34.37
Change+$0.25 (+0.73%)
Volume$483
Capitalization56.88B
Dine Brands Global
Price$24.36
Change-$1.42 (-5.51%)
Volume$330
Capitalization395.18M
CMPGF vs DIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGF vs. DIN commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGF is a Hold and DIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGF: $34.37 vs. DIN: $25.29)
Brand notoriety: CMPGF and DIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGF: 22% vs. DIN: 69%
Market capitalization -- CMPGF: $56.88B vs. DIN: $395.18M
CMPGF [@Restaurants] is valued at $56.88B. DIN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $395.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $204.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGF is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CMPGF (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while DIN (@Restaurants) price change was -3.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.05% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGF($56.9B) has a higher market cap than DIN($395M). CMPGF has higher P/E ratio than DIN: CMPGF (40.02) vs DIN (6.99). CMPGF YTD gains are higher at: 6.163 vs. DIN (-12.560). CMPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. DIN (190M). DIN has less debt than CMPGF: DIN (1.64B) vs CMPGF (7.12B). CMPGF has higher revenues than DIN: CMPGF (43.8B) vs DIN (821M).
CMPGFDINCMPGF / DIN
Capitalization56.9B395M14,405%
EBITDA3.6B190M1,895%
Gain YTD6.163-12.560-49%
P/E Ratio40.026.99573%
Revenue43.8B821M5,335%
Total Cash437MN/A-
Total Debt7.12B1.64B435%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGF vs DIN: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGF
DIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
874
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1745
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (5) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGF (45) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as DIN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGF’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMPGF (55) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as DIN (45) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGF’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSPEX67.360.86
+1.29%
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529E
VGSAX35.80N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Glb Rl Estt Secs A
GSPAX17.42N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium A
GCMRX34.02N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value R
MRASX11.40N/A
N/A
Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Inst

CMPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGF and CMPGY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGF and CMPGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGF
1D Price
Change %
CMPGF100%
+0.76%
CMPGY - CMPGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
WEN - CMPGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
DIN - CMPGF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
LOCO - CMPGF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
JDWPY - CMPGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More