CMPGY
Price
$35.45
Change
+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
59.81B
DMPZF
Price
$2.79
Change
-$0.51 (-15.45%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGY vs DMPZF

Header iconCMPGY vs DMPZF Comparison
Open Charts CMPGY vs DMPZFBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$35.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Volume$314.46K
Capitalization59.81B
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$2.79
Change-$0.51 (-15.45%)
Volume$6.18K
Capitalization1.06B
CMPGY vs DMPZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGY vs. DMPZF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGY is a StrongBuy and DMPZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGY: $35.44 vs. DMPZF: $2.79)
Brand notoriety: CMPGY and DMPZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGY: 100% vs. DMPZF: 845%
Market capitalization -- CMPGY: $59.81B vs. DMPZF: $1.06B
CMPGY [@Restaurants] is valued at $59.81B. DMPZF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDMPZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DMPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the long-term than DMPZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMPZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DMPZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the short-term than DMPZF.

Price Growth

CMPGY (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.90% price change this week, while DMPZF (@Restaurants) price change was -15.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.70% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($59.8B) has a higher market cap than DMPZF($1.06B). CMPGY has higher P/E ratio than DMPZF: CMPGY (41.26) vs DMPZF (10.60). CMPGY YTD gains are higher at: 7.498 vs. DMPZF (-27.344). CMPGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. DMPZF (162M). CMPGY has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. DMPZF (25.9M). DMPZF has less debt than CMPGY: DMPZF (536M) vs CMPGY (7.12B). CMPGY has higher revenues than DMPZF: CMPGY (43.8B) vs DMPZF (674M).
CMPGYDMPZFCMPGY / DMPZF
Capitalization59.8B1.06B5,652%
EBITDA3.6B162M2,222%
Gain YTD7.498-27.344-27%
P/E Ratio41.2610.60389%
Revenue43.8B674M6,499%
Total Cash437M25.9M1,687%
Total Debt7.12B536M1,328%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGY vs DMPZF: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGY
DMPZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
292
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5100
SMR RATING
1..100
9411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5189
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2390
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMPZF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGY (47). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMPZF (100). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew significantly faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMPGY (94). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMPZF (89). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMPZF (90). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew significantly faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGYDMPZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
45%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OGCP7.39N/A
N/A
Empire State Realty OP LP
BOF2.24-0.02
-0.88%
BranchOut Food
NICE148.63-5.29
-3.44%
NICE Ltd
DCTH10.19-0.45
-4.23%
Delcath Systems
MNTK1.95-0.13
-6.25%
Montauk Renewables

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and FWRG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and FWRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
+0.07%
FWRG - CMPGY
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.52%
ARCO - CMPGY
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
DIN - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
CMPGF - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More

DMPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMPZF and BDL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMPZF and BDL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMPZF
1D Price
Change %
DMPZF100%
N/A
BDL - DMPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.94%
DPUKY - DMPZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - DMPZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
CMPGF - DMPZF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - DMPZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More