CMPGY
Price
$32.79
Change
-$0.49 (-1.47%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
55.35B
16 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$96.63
Change
+$0.59 (+0.61%)
Updated
Apr 28, 02:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
392.76M
Ad is loading...

CMPGY vs NATH

Header iconCMPGY vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts CMPGY vs NATHBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$32.79
Change-$0.49 (-1.47%)
Volume$337.55K
Capitalization55.35B
Nathan's Famous
Price$96.63
Change+$0.59 (+0.61%)
Volume$100
Capitalization392.76M
CMPGY vs NATH Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGY vs. NATH commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGY is a StrongBuy and NATH is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGY: $32.79 vs. NATH: $96.04)
Brand notoriety: CMPGY and NATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGY: 115% vs. NATH: 37%
Market capitalization -- CMPGY: $55.35B vs. NATH: $392.76M
CMPGY [@Restaurants] is valued at $55.35B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $392.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $226.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than CMPGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

CMPGY (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.50% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was +2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

NATH is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.64% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($55.4B) has a higher market cap than NATH($393M). CMPGY has higher P/E ratio than NATH: CMPGY (39.89) vs NATH (16.56). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 22.795 vs. CMPGY (-1.222). CMPGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.41B vs. NATH (38.2M). CMPGY has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. NATH (23.7M). NATH has less debt than CMPGY: NATH (56.8M) vs CMPGY (5.91B). CMPGY has higher revenues than NATH: CMPGY (42B) vs NATH (146M).
CMPGYNATHCMPGY / NATH
Capitalization55.4B393M14,097%
EBITDA3.41B38.2M8,929%
Gain YTD-1.22222.795-5%
P/E Ratio39.8916.56241%
Revenue42B146M28,767%
Total Cash437M23.7M1,844%
Total Debt5.91B56.8M10,407%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGY vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGY
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
618
SMR RATING
1..100
9840
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1725
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
42n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMPGY's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as NATH (50) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as NATH (18) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's SMR Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGY (98) in the null industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMPGY (49) in the null industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as NATH (25) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGYNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCDVX16.660.13
+0.79%
Calamos Dividend Growth C
MKVEX14.590.08
+0.55%
MFS International Large Cap Value R2
TEMUX13.83N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Pathway Em Mkts Eq
BMEAX22.49-0.06
-0.27%
BlackRock High Equity Income Investor A
VSSVX10.03-0.04
-0.40%
VALIC Company I Small Cap Special Val

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and FWRG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and FWRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
-1.46%
FWRG - CMPGY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
ARCO - CMPGY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
DIN - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
CMPGF - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+0.23%
DIN - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
PZZA - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
LOCO - NATH
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
PBPB - NATH
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
KRUS - NATH
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
More