CMPO
Price
$14.21
Change
-$0.35 (-2.40%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.45B
18 days until earnings call
CRS
Price
$277.98
Change
+$1.26 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
13.84B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPO vs CRS

Header iconCMPO vs CRS Comparison
Open Charts CMPO vs CRSBanner chart's image
CompoSecure
Price$14.21
Change-$0.35 (-2.40%)
Volume$319.85K
Capitalization1.45B
Carpenter Technology
Price$277.98
Change+$1.26 (+0.46%)
Volume$726.44K
Capitalization13.84B
CMPO vs CRS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPO vs. CRS commentary
Jul 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPO is a Hold and CRS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPO: $14.21 vs. CRS: $277.98)
Brand notoriety: CMPO and CRS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPO: 46% vs. CRS: 71%
Market capitalization -- CMPO: $1.45B vs. CRS: $13.84B
CMPO [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $1.45B. CRS’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $13.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRS is a better buy in the long-term than CMPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CRS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPO is a better buy in the short-term than CRS.

Price Growth

CMPO (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -4.31% price change this week, while CRS (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +7.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPO is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

CRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+7.30% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRS($13.8B) has a higher market cap than CMPO($1.45B). CRS has higher P/E ratio than CMPO: CRS (39.37) vs CMPO (13.71). CRS YTD gains are higher at: 64.157 vs. CMPO (9.879). CRS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 624M vs. CMPO (-39.66M). CRS has more cash in the bank: 152M vs. CMPO (9.51M). CMPO has less debt than CRS: CMPO (0) vs CRS (703M). CRS has higher revenues than CMPO: CRS (2.92B) vs CMPO (376M).
CMPOCRSCMPO / CRS
Capitalization1.45B13.8B11%
EBITDA-39.66M624M-6%
Gain YTD9.87964.15715%
P/E Ratio13.7139.3735%
Revenue376M2.92B13%
Total Cash9.51M152M6%
Total Debt0703M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRS: Fundamental Ratings
CRS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPOCRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AETH41.132.64
+6.86%
Bitwise Trendwise Eth & TreasRotStgyETF
MEAR50.280.02
+0.04%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF
ALITF15.00N/A
N/A
ALLIANCE WITAN PLC
RLTY15.30-0.10
-0.65%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund
RSPC37.62-0.29
-0.75%
Invesco S&P 500® Eql Wght Comm Svcs ETF

CMPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPO has been loosely correlated with CRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPO jumps, then CRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPO
1D Price
Change %
CMPO100%
-2.40%
CRS - CMPO
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
ATI - CMPO
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
ZEUS - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
MT - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
CODI - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
More

CRS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRS has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRS jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRS
1D Price
Change %
CRS100%
+0.46%
NUE - CRS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
ATI - CRS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
ESAB - CRS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
MLI - CRS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
CLF - CRS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More