CMPO
Price
$10.62
Change
-$0.05 (-0.47%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
38 days until earnings call
CRS
Price
$166.54
Change
-$20.81 (-11.11%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.32B
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMPO vs CRS

Header iconCMPO vs CRS Comparison
Open Charts CMPO vs CRSBanner chart's image
CompoSecure
Price$10.62
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization1.09B
Carpenter Technology
Price$166.54
Change-$20.81 (-11.11%)
Volume$1.24M
Capitalization8.32B
CMPO vs CRS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPO vs. CRS commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPO is a Hold and CRS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPO: $10.62 vs. CRS: $166.54)
Brand notoriety: CMPO and CRS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPO: 81% vs. CRS: 143%
Market capitalization -- CMPO: $1.09B vs. CRS: $8.32B
CMPO [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $1.09B. CRS’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $8.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $1.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRS is a better buy in the long-term than CMPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CRS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPO is a better buy in the short-term than CRS.

Price Growth

CMPO (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -5.93% price change this week, while CRS (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -10.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -3.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPO is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

CRS is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (-3.57% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRS($8.32B) has a higher market cap than CMPO($1.09B). CRS has higher P/E ratio than CMPO: CRS (31.42) vs CMPO (13.71). CRS YTD gains are higher at: -1.769 vs. CMPO (-17.881). CRS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 512M vs. CMPO (-51.63M). CRS has more cash in the bank: 162M vs. CMPO (77.5M). CMPO has less debt than CRS: CMPO (202M) vs CRS (702M). CRS has higher revenues than CMPO: CRS (2.88B) vs CMPO (421M).
CMPOCRSCMPO / CRS
Capitalization1.09B8.32B13%
EBITDA-51.63M512M-10%
Gain YTD-17.881-1.7691,011%
P/E Ratio13.7131.4244%
Revenue421M2.88B15%
Total Cash77.5M162M48%
Total Debt202M702M29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRS: Fundamental Ratings
CRS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPOCRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPV34.220.95
+2.87%
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe
TLH104.850.93
+0.89%
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
EOT16.74-0.03
-0.21%
EATON VANCE NATIONAL Municipal OPPORTUNITIES TRUST
AVSE50.93-0.95
-1.83%
Avantis Responsible Emerging Mkts Eq ETF
VTWV125.66-9.17
-6.80%
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF

CMPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPO and ZEUS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPO and ZEUS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPO
1D Price
Change %
CMPO100%
-0.47%
ZEUS - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-8.84%
MT - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.29%
CODI - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.49%
CRS - CMPO
26%
Poorly correlated
-11.11%
CMC - CMPO
25%
Poorly correlated
-11.52%
More

CRS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRS has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRS jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRS
1D Price
Change %
CRS100%
-11.11%
NUE - CRS
65%
Loosely correlated
-10.76%
ATI - CRS
63%
Loosely correlated
-9.41%
CLF - CRS
53%
Loosely correlated
-16.84%
RS - CRS
50%
Loosely correlated
-6.32%
MTUS - CRS
49%
Loosely correlated
-10.47%
More