CMPO
Price
$10.87
Change
+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.11B
17 days until earnings call
MT
Price
$29.41
Change
+$0.52 (+1.80%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.02B
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMPO vs MT

Header iconCMPO vs MT Comparison
Open Charts CMPO vs MTBanner chart's image
CompoSecure
Price$10.87
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Volume$473.39K
Capitalization1.11B
ArcelorMittal
Price$29.41
Change+$0.52 (+1.80%)
Volume$1.64M
Capitalization22.02B
CMPO vs MT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPO vs. MT commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPO is a StrongBuy and MT is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPO: $10.87 vs. MT: $29.41)
Brand notoriety: CMPO: Not notable vs. MT: Notable
CMPO represents the Metal Fabrication, while MT is part of the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPO: 43% vs. MT: 62%
Market capitalization -- CMPO: $1.11B vs. MT: $22.02B
CMPO [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $1.11B. MT’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $22.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $26.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $1.96B. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the long-term than CMPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMPO and MT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMPO (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while MT (@Steel) price change was +8.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +6.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.87%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+6.35% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

@Steel (+2.71% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($22B) has a higher market cap than CMPO($1.11B). MT has higher P/E ratio than CMPO: MT (17.40) vs CMPO (13.71). MT YTD gains are higher at: 27.151 vs. CMPO (-15.948). MT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.06B vs. CMPO (-51.63M). MT has more cash in the bank: 6.4B vs. CMPO (77.5M). CMPO has less debt than MT: CMPO (202M) vs MT (11.6B). MT has higher revenues than CMPO: MT (62.4B) vs CMPO (421M).
CMPOMTCMPO / MT
Capitalization1.11B22B5%
EBITDA-51.63M6.06B-1%
Gain YTD-15.94827.151-59%
P/E Ratio13.7117.4079%
Revenue421M62.4B1%
Total Cash77.5M6.4B1%
Total Debt202M11.6B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MT: Fundamental Ratings
MT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPOMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGLHX23.570.41
+1.77%
American Funds Global Insight R-2E
PREQX6.04N/A
N/A
PACE Global Real Estate Securities P
FSISX8.72N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI International Sm Cp Idx
FSGRX19.48N/A
N/A
Franklin Small Cap Growth A
HGXIX15.07N/A
N/A
Hartford Global Impact I

CMPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPO and CRS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPO and CRS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPO
1D Price
Change %
CMPO100%
+0.46%
CRS - CMPO
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
ATI - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.05%
ESAB - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
ZEUS - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
MT - CMPO
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
More

MT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with CLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then CLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MT
1D Price
Change %
MT100%
+1.80%
CLF - MT
61%
Loosely correlated
+4.91%
TX - MT
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
SID - MT
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.37%
CMC - MT
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
GGB - MT
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
More