It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CMPS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -7.52% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1650.83%.
CMPS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
CMPS | PSIL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago80% | 7 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 5 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPS and AVAH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPS and AVAH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CMPS | 100% | +3.07% | ||
AVAH - CMPS | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
CIVI - CMPS | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
LFST - CMPS | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
ASTH - CMPS | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
AMN - CMPS | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSIL has been loosely correlated with MNMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSIL jumps, then MNMD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSIL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSIL | 100% | +0.80% | ||
MNMD - PSIL | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.51% | ||
ATAI - PSIL | 42% Loosely correlated | +17.52% | ||
CMPS - PSIL | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
VTGN - PSIL | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.66% | ||
CYBN - PSIL | 29% Poorly correlated | +5.45% | ||
More |