CMPVF
Price
$23.85
Change
+$0.10 (+0.42%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
MGPPF
Price
$9.25
Change
-$0.60 (-6.09%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPVF vs MGPPF

Header iconCMPVF vs MGPPF Comparison
Open Charts CMPVF vs MGPPFBanner chart's image
CompuGoup Med SE
Price$23.85
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
Volume$421
Capitalization1.34B
Megaport
Price$9.25
Change-$0.60 (-6.09%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.69B
CMPVF vs MGPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPVF vs. MGPPF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPVF is a StrongBuy and MGPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPVF: $23.85 vs. MGPPF: $9.25)
Brand notoriety: CMPVF and MGPPF are both not notable
CMPVF represents the Services to the Health Industry, while MGPPF is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPVF: 100% vs. MGPPF: 9%
Market capitalization -- CMPVF: $1.34B vs. MGPPF: $1.69B
CMPVF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $1.34B. MGPPF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $1.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $46.82B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.73T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.28B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPVF is a better buy in the long-term than MGPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGPPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGPPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CMPVF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MGPPF (@Computer Communications) price change was -6.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +3.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.60%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (+3.41% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Computer Communications (+2.99% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGPPF($1.69B) has a higher market cap than CMPVF($1.34B). MGPPF has higher P/E ratio than CMPVF: MGPPF (378.22) vs CMPVF (41.34). MGPPF YTD gains are higher at: 101.648 vs. CMPVF (32.229). CMPVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 196M vs. MGPPF (39.3M). CMPVF has higher revenues than MGPPF: CMPVF (1.16B) vs MGPPF (207M).
CMPVFMGPPFCMPVF / MGPPF
Capitalization1.34B1.69B79%
EBITDA196M39.3M499%
Gain YTD32.229101.64832%
P/E Ratio41.34378.2211%
Revenue1.16B207M558%
Total Cash129MN/A-
Total Debt827MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPVF vs MGPPF: Fundamental Ratings
CMPVF
MGPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4498
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8687
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
189
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMPVF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGPPF (95). This means that CMPVF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGPPF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPPF (100). This means that CMPVF’s stock grew similarly to MGPPF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPVF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPPF (87). This means that CMPVF’s stock grew similarly to MGPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPPF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPVF (53). This means that MGPPF’s stock grew similarly to CMPVF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPPF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPVF (18). This means that MGPPF’s stock grew similarly to CMPVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPVFMGPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMGFX55.820.52
+0.94%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R5
SASMX37.18N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth A
PJRAX9.45N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq A
SMLKX21.20N/A
N/A
Shelton S&P Smallcap Index K
EPSYX24.92N/A
N/A
NYLI Epoch Global Equity Yield Class I

CMPVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPVF has been loosely correlated with MGPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPVF jumps, then MGPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPVF
1D Price
Change %
CMPVF100%
N/A
MGPPF - CMPVF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ROIUF - CMPVF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
THNCF - CMPVF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOPA - CMPVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
EVTC - CMPVF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More

MGPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGPPF has been loosely correlated with CMPVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGPPF jumps, then CMPVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPPF
1D Price
Change %
MGPPF100%
N/A
CMPVF - MGPPF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TALK - MGPPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
QTWO - MGPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
NCNO - MGPPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
MDTC - MGPPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-62.96%
More