Advertisement
CMS vs CRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMS is a Buy and CRS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- CRS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.33% price change this week, while CRS (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.02%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
CRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.10% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
@Metal Fabrication (+0.07% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| CMS | CRS | CMS / CRS | |
| Capitalization | 17.9B | 13.9B | 129% |
| EBITDA | 2.78B | 624M | 445% |
| Gain YTD | 7.697 | 64.937 | 12% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.93 | 39.45 | 51% |
| Revenue | 7.46B | 2.92B | 256% |
| Total Cash | 227M | 152M | 149% |
| Total Debt | 15.6B | 703M | 2,219% |
CMS | CRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMS's Valuation (66) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CRS (83) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to CRS’s over the last 12 months.
CRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMS (39) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CRS's SMR Rating (42) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as CMS (60) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRS’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CRS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as CMS (54) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRS’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CRS (65) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to CRS’s over the last 12 months.
| CMS | CRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 44% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NMS | 11.30 | 0.03 | +0.30% |
| Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| PJUL | 44.04 | 0.07 | +0.16% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jul | |||
| XRT | 79.09 | 0.03 | +0.04% |
| SPDR® S&P Retail ETF | |||
| EVMT | 15.32 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco Elctc vhcl Mtls Cmd StgyNoK-1ETF | |||
| MYMJ | 24.39 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR SSGA My2030 Municipal Bond ETF | |||
CRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRS has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRS jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.