CLF
Price
$11.15
Change
-$0.74 (-6.22%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.78B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CRS
Price
$584.69
Change
-$3.08 (-0.52%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.2B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs CRS

CLF vs CRS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) vs. Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CRS has delivered robust year-to-date gains exceeding 35%, starkly contrasting CLF's decline of over 25%.
  • Recent market activity shows CLF with one-month returns around 20%, but three-month performance lagging at negative 30%.
  • CRS benefits from strong demand in aerospace and defense, driving consistent upward momentum and record highs.
  • CLF posted Q1 revenue of $4.9 billion, beating estimates, though net losses persist amid automotive sector headwinds.
  • Specialty metals exposure positions CRS favorably against broader steel cyclicality affecting CLF.

Introduction

Investors and traders navigating the basic materials sector often compare steel and specialty metals producers like Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). This stock comparison highlights their relative performance, sector drivers, and market positioning in recent weeks. Value-oriented investors seeking cyclical recovery plays may eye CLF, while growth-focused traders favor CRS's momentum amid aerospace demand. Understanding these dynamics aids in assessing trade-offs in volatility, growth potential, and sentiment shifts for diversified portfolios or sector rotations.

CLF Overview and Recent Performance

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) is North America's largest flat-rolled steel producer and iron ore pellet supplier, primarily serving the automotive industry. In recent market activity, CLF shares have shown volatility, with one-month gains around 20% offset by steeper three-month declines near 30%. Year-to-date, the stock is down over 25%. Q1 results featured $4.9 billion in revenue, surpassing prior-year and sequential figures, alongside adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $95 million and steel shipments exceeding 4 million tons. Sentiment reflects pressures from automotive demand softness and elevated costs, though higher hot-rolled coil prices provided some support. Trading near $10, CLF faces cyclical steel market challenges.

CRS Overview and Recent Performance

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) manufactures and distributes specialty alloys for aerospace, defense, and industrial applications. Recent weeks have seen CRS shares surge to all-time highs above $450 before consolidating around $427, with year-to-date returns surpassing 35%. The stock's strength stems from robust sector demand, evidenced by Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings where EPS reached $2.33, beating estimates, and operating income hit $155 million. Specialty Alloys Operations drove gains with elevated sales. Positive sentiment is bolstered by aerospace recovery and a recent quarterly dividend declaration. Trading at elevated multiples, CRS reflects premium positioning in high-growth end-markets.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 350 available, selected by AI for suitability in current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from +15% to +168%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Strategies vary widely—trend-following, signal-based, long/short pairs, and multi-ticker portfolios—targeting sectors like semiconductors, aerospace, energy, and leveraged plays, with trade durations from 1 day to 55 days. Virtual and brokerage agents offer risk management and customization. Traders can explore these high-performing options to enhance strategies amid volatile markets; visit the page to discover bots matching your timeframe and risk profile.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CLF operates an integrated steel model focused on flat-rolled products and iron ore, tying performance to automotive cycles and commodity pricing, while CRS specializes in premium alloys for aerospace and defense, benefiting from secular demand growth. Growth drivers diverge: CLF relies on volume recovery and cost discipline amid steel oversupply risks, versus CRS's tailwinds from aircraft production ramps. Recent momentum favors CRS with sustained highs and superior returns; CLF exhibits choppier relative performance. Risk factors include CLF's higher cyclicality and debt exposure versus CRS's balanced leverage and niche market stability. Sector sentiment tilts positive for specialty metals over broad steel amid infrastructure and defense spending.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI currently favors CRS over CLF, driven by superior trend consistency, earnings beats, and alignment with high-demand sectors like aerospace. CRS's relative stability and momentum suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, though CLF could rebound on steel pricing catalysts. Observable factors point to CRS as the stronger positioned pick probabilistically.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CLF vs. CRS commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Hold and CRS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CLF: $11.89 vs. CRS: $587.77)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. CRS: Not notable
CLF represents the Steel, while CRS is part of the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 91% vs. CRS: 194%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $6.78B vs. CRS: $29.2B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $6.78B. CRS’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $29.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $55.78B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $10.64B. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRS is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRS is a better buy in the short-term than CLF.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а -12.77% price change this week, while CRS (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +4.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -6.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +144.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.91%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

CRS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-6.08% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

@Metal Fabrication (-2.61% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRS($29.2B) has a higher market cap than CLF($6.78B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than CRS: CLF (145.67) vs CRS (61.87). CRS YTD gains are higher at: 86.883 vs. CLF (-10.467). CRS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 785M vs. CLF (138M). CRS has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. CLF (45M). CRS has less debt than CLF: CRS (699M) vs CLF (7.76B). CLF has higher revenues than CRS: CLF (18.9B) vs CRS (3.03B).
CLFCRSCLF / CRS
Capitalization6.78B29.2B23%
EBITDA138M785M18%
Gain YTD-10.46786.883-12%
P/E Ratio145.6761.87235%
Revenue18.9B3.03B624%
Total Cash45M295M15%
Total Debt7.76B699M1,111%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs CRS: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
CRS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7542
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1001
SMR RATING
1..100
9739
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLF's Valuation (67) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CRS (82) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to CRS’s over the last 12 months.

CRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (100) in the Steel industry. This means that CRS’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CRS's SMR Rating (39) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (97) in the Steel industry. This means that CRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CRS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as CLF (39) in the Steel industry. This means that CRS’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CRS (14) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to CRS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFCRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CRS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STRAX.X0.0106320.000227
+2.18%
Xertra cryptocurrency
AAVE.X75.0424001.105888
+1.50%
Aave cryptocurrency
YFI.X1802.60730011.710815
+0.65%
Yearn cryptocurrency
BAR.X0.273053-0.001415
-0.52%
FC Barcelona Fan Token cryptocurrency
GFT.X0.000035-0.000001
-2.51%
Gifto cryptocurrency

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
-3.18%
NUE - CLF
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
CMC - CLF
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
STLD - CLF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
MT - CLF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
TX - CLF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More

CRS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRS has been closely correlated with ATI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRS jumps, then ATI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRS
1D Price
Change %
CRS100%
+0.22%
ATI - CRS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
NUE - CRS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
CLF - CRS
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.18%
RS - CRS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
MTUS - CRS
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
More