CMSQF
Price
$27.40
Change
+$5.63 (+25.86%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
CSOL
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
472.24K
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMSQF vs CSOL

Header iconCMSQF vs CSOL Comparison
Open Charts CMSQF vs CSOLBanner chart's image
Computershare
Price$27.40
Change+$5.63 (+25.86%)
Volume$151
Capitalization10.1B
China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization472.24K
CMSQF vs CSOL Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMSQF vs. CSOL commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSQF is a Hold and CSOL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CMSQF: $27.40 vs. CSOL: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: CMSQF and CSOL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMSQF: 21% vs. CSOL: 12%
Market capitalization -- CMSQF: $10.1B vs. CSOL: $472.24K
CMSQF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $10.1B. CSOL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $472.24K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMSQF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSOL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMSQF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CSOL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMSQF is a better buy in the long-term than CSOL.

Price Growth

CMSQF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CSOL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +93.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSOL is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMSQF($10.1B) has a higher market cap than CSOL($472K). CMSQF YTD gains are higher at: 45.358 vs. CSOL (0.826). CMSQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 825M vs. CSOL (-490.28K). CMSQF has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. CSOL (6.45M). CSOL has less debt than CMSQF: CSOL (2.86M) vs CMSQF (2.77B). CMSQF has higher revenues than CSOL: CMSQF (2.9B) vs CSOL (22.8M).
CMSQFCSOLCMSQF / CSOL
Capitalization10.1B472K2,139,831%
EBITDA825M-490.28K-168,272%
Gain YTD45.3580.8265,488%
P/E Ratio29.59N/A-
Revenue2.9B22.8M12,706%
Total Cash1.08B6.45M16,760%
Total Debt2.77B2.86M96,785%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMSQF vs CSOL: Fundamental Ratings
CMSQF
CSOL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4991
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4100
SMR RATING
1..100
9490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3764
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSOL's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQF (38). This means that CSOL’s stock grew similarly to CMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSOL (100). This means that CMSQF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSOL’s over the last 12 months.

CSOL's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQF (94). This means that CSOL’s stock grew similarly to CMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CSOL (64). This means that CMSQF’s stock grew similarly to CSOL’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSOL (100). This means that CMSQF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSOL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSGLX36.780.09
+0.25%
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Gr I
APDKX51.730.04
+0.08%
Artisan International Value Advisor
OYRDX26.78N/A
N/A
Invesco Rising Dividends Y
AGCLX19.02N/A
N/A
American Century Global Small Cap A
HAMVX25.53-0.05
-0.20%
Harbor Mid Cap Value Instl

CMSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMSQF and CFNCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMSQF and CFNCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQF
1D Price
Change %
CMSQF100%
N/A
CFNCF - CMSQF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCQEF - CMSQF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CURN - CMSQF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
CSOL - CMSQF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSEEY - CMSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More

CSOL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSOL and CMSQF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSOL and CMSQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSOL
1D Price
Change %
CSOL100%
N/A
CMSQF - CSOL
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSEEY - CSOL
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
CURN - CSOL
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
CIIHY - CSOL
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPXCF - CSOL
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More