CMSQY
Price
$25.30
Change
-$0.06 (-0.24%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
GS
Price
$545.37
Change
+$16.06 (+3.03%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
134.2B
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMSQY vs GS

Header iconCMSQY vs GS Comparison
Open Charts CMSQY vs GSBanner chart's image
Computershare
Price$25.30
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
Volume$15.61K
Capitalization10.1B
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$545.37
Change+$16.06 (+3.03%)
Volume$2.22M
Capitalization134.2B
CMSQY vs GS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMSQY vs. GS commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSQY is a StrongBuy and GS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CMSQY: $25.30 vs. GS: $545.37)
Brand notoriety: CMSQY: Not notable vs. GS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMSQY: 46% vs. GS: 67%
Market capitalization -- CMSQY: $10.1B vs. GS: $134.2B
CMSQY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $10.1B. GS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $134.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMSQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMSQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMSQY is a better buy in the long-term than GS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMSQY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMSQY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMSQY is a better buy in the short-term than GS.

Price Growth

CMSQY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.77% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +7.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +134.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.86% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than CMSQY($10.1B). CMSQY has higher P/E ratio than GS: CMSQY (32.15) vs GS (18.08). CMSQY YTD gains are higher at: 22.603 vs. GS (-4.287). CMSQY has less debt than GS: CMSQY (2.77B) vs GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than CMSQY: GS (46.3B) vs CMSQY (2.9B).
CMSQYGSCMSQY / GS
Capitalization10.1B134B8%
EBITDA825MN/A-
Gain YTD22.603-4.287-527%
P/E Ratio32.1518.08178%
Revenue2.9B46.3B6%
Total Cash1.08BN/A-
Total Debt2.77B333B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMSQY vs GS: Fundamental Ratings
CMSQY
GS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
716
SMR RATING
1..100
944
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2674
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMSQY's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GS (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as GS (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (4) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMSQY (94) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew significantly faster than CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GS (56) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GS (74) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSQYGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRBT2.440.34
+16.19%
iRobot Corp
SONM1.610.13
+8.78%
Sonim Technologies Inc.
GOGO7.410.44
+6.31%
Gogo
DFS187.468.77
+4.91%
Discover Financial Services
NCNO23.180.38
+1.67%
nCino

CMSQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMSQY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMSQY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQY
1D Price
Change %
CMSQY100%
-0.24%
MQBKY - CMSQY
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.79%
ASXFY - CMSQY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
SNEX - CMSQY
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
GS - CMSQY
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
NMR - CMSQY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
+3.03%
MS - GS
91%
Closely correlated
+2.93%
EVR - GS
87%
Closely correlated
+5.86%
SF - GS
87%
Closely correlated
+3.55%
PIPR - GS
85%
Closely correlated
+3.30%
JEF - GS
84%
Closely correlated
+3.29%
More