CMSQY
Price
$24.40
Change
-$0.07 (-0.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.18B
MQBKY
Price
$145.08
Change
+$0.22 (+0.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
55.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMSQY vs MQBKY

Header iconCMSQY vs MQBKY Comparison
Open Charts CMSQY vs MQBKYBanner chart's image
Computershare
Price$24.40
Change-$0.07 (-0.29%)
Volume$49.37K
Capitalization14.18B
Macquarie Group
Price$145.08
Change+$0.22 (+0.15%)
Volume$6.06K
Capitalization55.32B
CMSQY vs MQBKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMSQY vs. MQBKY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSQY is a Buy and MQBKY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMSQY: $24.40 vs. MQBKY: $145.08)
Brand notoriety: CMSQY and MQBKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMSQY: 334% vs. MQBKY: 48%
Market capitalization -- CMSQY: $14.18B vs. MQBKY: $55.32B
CMSQY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $14.18B. MQBKY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $55.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMSQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMQBKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMSQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MQBKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMSQY and MQBKY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMSQY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MQBKY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMSQY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MQBKY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MQBKY is a better buy in the short-term than CMSQY.

Price Growth

CMSQY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.20% price change this week, while MQBKY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.77% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQBKY($55.3B) has a higher market cap than CMSQY($14.2B). CMSQY (23.72) and MQBKY (22.73) have similar P/E ratio . CMSQY YTD gains are higher at: 20.518 vs. MQBKY (8.148). MQBKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.5B vs. CMSQY (1.04B). MQBKY has more cash in the bank: 88B vs. CMSQY (441M). CMSQY has less debt than MQBKY: CMSQY (1.74B) vs MQBKY (330B). MQBKY has higher revenues than CMSQY: MQBKY (6.79B) vs CMSQY (3.01B).
CMSQYMQBKYCMSQY / MQBKY
Capitalization14.2B55.3B26%
EBITDA1.04B20.5B5%
Gain YTD20.5188.148252%
P/E Ratio23.7222.73104%
Revenue3.01B6.79B44%
Total Cash441M88B1%
Total Debt1.74B330B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMSQY vs MQBKY: Fundamental Ratings
CMSQY
MQBKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1022
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1639
SMR RATING
1..100
498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5459
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MQBKY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQY (27). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as MQBKY (39). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMSQY (49). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQY (59). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MQBKY (59). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSQYMQBKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VKQ9.230.13
+1.43%
Invesco Municipal Trust
VYLD26.580.27
+1.04%
Inverse Vix Short-Term Futures Etns Due March 22, 2045
EFAV85.430.50
+0.59%
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
XTWO49.550.07
+0.15%
BondBloxx Bloomberg Two YrTrgDurUSTrsETF
TYLD25.43N/A
N/A
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF

CMSQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMSQY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMSQY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQY
1D Price
Change %
CMSQY100%
-0.29%
MQBKY - CMSQY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
ASXFY - CMSQY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
SNEX - CMSQY
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
GS - CMSQY
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
NMR - CMSQY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
More

MQBKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQBKY has been loosely correlated with ASXFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQBKY jumps, then ASXFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQBKY
1D Price
Change %
MQBKY100%
+0.15%
ASXFY - MQBKY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
MCO - MQBKY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
MC - MQBKY
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
EVR - MQBKY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
PIPR - MQBKY
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
More