CMSQY
Price
$23.82
Change
-$0.55 (-2.26%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
NMR
Price
$5.24
Change
-$0.39 (-6.93%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.15B
21 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMSQY vs NMR

Header iconCMSQY vs NMR Comparison
Open Charts CMSQY vs NMRBanner chart's image
Computershare
Price$23.82
Change-$0.55 (-2.26%)
Volume$20.36K
Capitalization10.1B
Nomura Holdings
Price$5.24
Change-$0.39 (-6.93%)
Volume$100
Capitalization18.15B
CMSQY vs NMR Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMSQY vs. NMR commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSQY is a Hold and NMR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CMSQY: $23.82 vs. NMR: $5.63)
Brand notoriety: CMSQY and NMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMSQY: 81% vs. NMR: 206%
Market capitalization -- CMSQY: $10.1B vs. NMR: $18.15B
CMSQY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $10.1B. NMR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $18.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMSQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMSQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMSQY is a better buy in the long-term than NMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMSQY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMSQY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the short-term than CMSQY.

Price Growth

CMSQY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.95% price change this week, while NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -14.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +137.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.53% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($18.1B) has a higher market cap than CMSQY($10.1B). CMSQY has higher P/E ratio than NMR: CMSQY (32.15) vs NMR (25.08). CMSQY YTD gains are higher at: 15.431 vs. NMR (-2.763). CMSQY has less debt than NMR: CMSQY (2.77B) vs NMR (13.16T). NMR has higher revenues than CMSQY: NMR (1.27T) vs CMSQY (2.9B).
CMSQYNMRCMSQY / NMR
Capitalization10.1B18.1B56%
EBITDA825MN/A-
Gain YTD15.431-2.763-558%
P/E Ratio32.1525.08128%
Revenue2.9B1.27T0%
Total Cash1.08BN/A-
Total Debt2.77B13.16T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMSQY vs NMR: Fundamental Ratings
CMSQY
NMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6269
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
454
SMR RATING
1..100
641
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMSQY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMR (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMSQY (64) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (51) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMR (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSQYNMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPAC5.80-0.01
-0.17%
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA
VCEL43.49-0.82
-1.85%
Vericel Corp
ROKU60.26-11.16
-15.63%
Roku
NAUT0.75-0.14
-15.82%
Nautilus Biotechnolgy
VRPX0.67-0.55
-45.12%
Virpax Pharmaceuticals Inc

CMSQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMSQY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMSQY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQY
1D Price
Change %
CMSQY100%
-2.26%
MQBKY - CMSQY
37%
Loosely correlated
-4.70%
ASXFY - CMSQY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
SNEX - CMSQY
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.82%
GS - CMSQY
30%
Poorly correlated
-9.21%
NMR - CMSQY
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.75%
More

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with DSEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then DSEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
-8.75%
DSEEY - NMR
61%
Loosely correlated
-6.47%
IX - NMR
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
JPXGY - NMR
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
GS - NMR
49%
Loosely correlated
-9.21%
MS - NMR
46%
Loosely correlated
-9.51%
More