CMSQY
Price
$24.40
Change
-$0.07 (-0.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.18B
NMR
Price
$7.20
Change
+$0.04 (+0.56%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
21.09B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMSQY vs NMR

Header iconCMSQY vs NMR Comparison
Open Charts CMSQY vs NMRBanner chart's image
Computershare
Price$24.40
Change-$0.07 (-0.29%)
Volume$49.37K
Capitalization14.18B
Nomura Holdings
Price$7.20
Change+$0.04 (+0.56%)
Volume$315.53K
Capitalization21.09B
CMSQY vs NMR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMSQY vs. NMR commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSQY is a Buy and NMR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMSQY: $24.40 vs. NMR: $7.20)
Brand notoriety: CMSQY and NMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMSQY: 334% vs. NMR: 63%
Market capitalization -- CMSQY: $14.18B vs. NMR: $21.09B
CMSQY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $14.18B. NMR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $21.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMSQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMSQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMSQY is a better buy in the long-term than NMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMSQY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMSQY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the short-term than CMSQY.

Price Growth

CMSQY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.20% price change this week, while NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.77% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($21.1B) has a higher market cap than CMSQY($14.2B). CMSQY has higher P/E ratio than NMR: CMSQY (23.72) vs NMR (8.67). NMR YTD gains are higher at: 24.352 vs. CMSQY (20.518). CMSQY has less debt than NMR: CMSQY (1.74B) vs NMR (15.59T). NMR has higher revenues than CMSQY: NMR (1.73T) vs CMSQY (3.01B).
CMSQYNMRCMSQY / NMR
Capitalization14.2B21.1B67%
EBITDA1.04BN/A-
Gain YTD20.51824.35284%
P/E Ratio23.728.67274%
Revenue3.01B1.73T0%
Total Cash441MN/A-
Total Debt1.74B15.59T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMSQY vs NMR: Fundamental Ratings
CMSQY
NMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1652
SMR RATING
1..100
491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5484
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CMSQY (27) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMR (52) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMSQY (49) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CMSQY (59) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (84) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSQYNMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBSD20.830.07
+0.32%
FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS ETF
FEBP30.47N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Feb
BFAP24.08N/A
N/A
Ft Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF
CET50.22-0.35
-0.69%
Central Securities Corp
FCG23.31-0.53
-2.22%
First Trust Natural Gas ETF

CMSQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMSQY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMSQY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQY
1D Price
Change %
CMSQY100%
-0.29%
MQBKY - CMSQY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
ASXFY - CMSQY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
SNEX - CMSQY
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
GS - CMSQY
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
NMR - CMSQY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
More

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with DSEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then DSEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
+0.56%
DSEEY - NMR
61%
Loosely correlated
+7.85%
MS - NMR
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
GS - NMR
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
SF - NMR
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
EVR - NMR
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
More