Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMTFX vs FSELX
CMTFX vs FSELX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs FSELX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$100.93
Change-$0.38 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.93B
Fidelity Select Semiconductors
Price$36.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.76B
CMTFX vs FSELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. FSELX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Buy and FSELX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSELX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. CMTFX (3.93B). CMTFX (0.00) and FSELX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than FSELX: CMTFX (25 years) vs FSELX (40 years). CMTFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSELX (0.62). FSELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). FSELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: FSELX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.09 vs. FSELX (-0.08). FSELX return over 5 years is better than : 192.96 vs. CMTFX (101.62).
| CMTFX | FSELX | CMTFX / FSELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.282 | 8.754 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 21.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | -0.08 | -14,688% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.45 | 152.91 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.62 | 192.96 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 405.91 | 361.79 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers