Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMTFX vs FSELX
CMTFX vs FSELX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs FSELX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$105.59
Change+$0.79 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.11B
Fidelity Select Semiconductors
Price$37.77
Change+$0.44 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
CMTFX vs FSELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. FSELX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Buy and FSELX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSELX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. CMTFX (4.11B). CMTFX (0.00) and FSELX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than FSELX: CMTFX (25 years) vs FSELX (40 years). CMTFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSELX (0.62). FSELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). FSELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: FSELX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.24 vs. FSELX (23.43). FSELX return over 5 years is better than : 196.87 vs. CMTFX (104.39).
| CMTFX | FSELX | CMTFX / FSELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.374 | 12.847 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.11B | 23.1B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.24 | 23.43 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.88 | 128.26 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.39 | 196.87 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 429.01 | 399.51 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers