Ad is loading...
CMTFX vs FSPTX
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs FSPTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$70.80
Change-$1.23 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.83B
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$27.27
Change-$0.72 (-2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.19B
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. FSPTX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Hold and FSPTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 14.2B vs. CMTFX (2.83B). CMTFX (0.00) and FSPTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than FSPTX: CMTFX (24 years) vs FSPTX (44 years). CMTFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.64). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: FSPTX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.88 vs. FSPTX (-13.43). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.60 vs. FSPTX (56.01).
| CMTFX | FSPTX | CMTFX / FSPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.64 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.64 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -21.296 | -24.837 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.83B | 14.2B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.88 | -13.43 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.30 | 18.12 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.60 | 56.01 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 265.45 | 128.97 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...