Ad is loading...
CMTFX vs FSPTX
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs FSPTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$82.24
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.2B
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$30.88
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.19B
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. FSPTX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Buy and FSPTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 14.2B vs. CMTFX (3.2B). CMTFX (0.00) and FSPTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than FSPTX: CMTFX (24 years) vs FSPTX (44 years). CMTFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: FSPTX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. FSPTX (-1.38). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.37 vs. FSPTX (58.45).
| CMTFX | FSPTX | CMTFX / FSPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.752 | -16.405 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.2B | 14.2B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | -1.38 | -358% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.54 | 43.48 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.37 | 58.45 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 315.89 | 153.92 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...