Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMTFX vs FSPTX
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs FSPTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$94.56
Change+$0.74 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.66B
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$36.09
Change+$0.44 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.61B
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. FSPTX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Buy and FSPTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. CMTFX (3.66B). CMTFX (0.00) and FSPTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than FSPTX: CMTFX (25 years) vs FSPTX (44 years). CMTFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: FSPTX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.37 vs. FSPTX (4.45). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 104.40 vs. FSPTX (62.73).
| CMTFX | FSPTX | CMTFX / FSPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.513 | -3.335 | -75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 15.6B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.37 | 4.45 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.71 | 70.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.40 | 62.73 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 371.93 | 190.35 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement