CMTOY
Price
$12.74
Change
+$0.41 (+3.33%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
60 days until earnings call
GCWOF
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMTOY vs GCWOF

Header iconCMTOY vs GCWOF Comparison
Open Charts CMTOY vs GCWOFBanner chart's image
Cementos Argos S.A
Price$12.74
Change+$0.41 (+3.33%)
Volume$108
Capitalization3.16B
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.17K
Capitalization3.09B
CMTOY vs GCWOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMTOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMTOY vs. GCWOF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTOY is a Buy and GCWOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMTOY: $12.74 vs. GCWOF: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: CMTOY and GCWOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMTOY: 9% vs. GCWOF: 113%
Market capitalization -- CMTOY: $3.16B vs. GCWOF: $3.09B
CMTOY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $3.16B. GCWOF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMTOY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGCWOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMTOY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GCWOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMTOY is a better buy in the long-term than GCWOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMTOY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCWOF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMTOY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GCWOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMTOY is a better buy in the short-term than GCWOF.

Price Growth

CMTOY (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GCWOF (@Construction Materials) price change was +4.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMTOY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMTOY($3.16B) and GCWOF($3.09B) have the same market capitalization . CMTOY has higher P/E ratio than GCWOF: CMTOY (425.67) vs GCWOF (10.39). GCWOF YTD gains are higher at: 8.571 vs. CMTOY (7.591). CMTOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.05T vs. GCWOF (420M). CMTOY has higher revenues than GCWOF: CMTOY (12.63T) vs GCWOF (1.34B).
CMTOYGCWOFCMTOY / GCWOF
Capitalization3.16B3.09B102%
EBITDA2.05T420M489,048%
Gain YTD7.5918.57189%
P/E Ratio425.6710.394,098%
Revenue12.63T1.34B939,807%
Total CashN/A827M-
Total DebtN/A628M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMTOY vs GCWOF: Fundamental Ratings
CMTOY
GCWOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3149
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3843
SMR RATING
1..100
1753
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
126
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMTOY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCWOF (86). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew significantly faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (43). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTOY's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCWOF (53). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTOY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (49). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTOY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (26). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMTOYGCWOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMTOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VMVAX89.40N/A
N/A
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
TSLAX5.05N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Value A
UMBMX25.80N/A
N/A
Carillon Scout Mid Cap I
BIGUX32.17N/A
N/A
Baron International Growth R6
WWSYX21.38N/A
N/A
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Ultra

CMTOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMTOY and SDCVF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMTOY and SDCVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTOY
1D Price
Change %
CMTOY100%
N/A
SDCVF - CMTOY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBUMY - CMTOY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
HLBZF - CMTOY
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
CTXXF - CMTOY
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
GCWOF - CMTOY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GCWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCWOF and CX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCWOF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCWOF
1D Price
Change %
GCWOF100%
N/A
CX - GCWOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
HCMLY - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
CTXXF - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
CMTOY - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
More