Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMVIX vs RGACX
CMVIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CMVIX vs RGACX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Instl
Price$26.51
Change+$0.43 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$77.51
Change+$1.32 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.77B
CMVIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMVIX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMVIX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. CMVIX (1.46B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CMVIX: RGACX (0.08) vs CMVIX (0.04). CMVIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CMVIX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CMVIX (0.80). CMVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMVIX: RGACX (250) vs CMVIX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.07 vs. CMVIX (-7.78). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.49 vs. CMVIX (39.39).
| CMVIX | RGACX | CMVIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.098 | 4.820 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.08 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.78 | 6.07 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.10 | 44.40 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.39 | 43.49 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.73 | 69.24 | 148% |