CMWAY
Price
$111.16
Change
-$0.53 (-0.47%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
118.93B
FANDF
Price
$4.17
Change
-$0.07 (-1.65%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
23.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMWAY vs FANDF

Header iconCMWAY vs FANDF Comparison
Open Charts CMWAY vs FANDFBanner chart's image
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Price$111.16
Change-$0.53 (-0.47%)
Volume$101.01K
Capitalization118.93B
Firstrand
Price$4.17
Change-$0.07 (-1.65%)
Volume$10.83K
Capitalization23.1B
CMWAY vs FANDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMWAY vs. FANDF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMWAY is a StrongBuy and FANDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CMWAY: $111.16 vs. FANDF: $4.17)
Brand notoriety: CMWAY and FANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMWAY: 93% vs. FANDF: 201%
Market capitalization -- CMWAY: $118.93B vs. FANDF: $23.1B
CMWAY [@Major Banks] is valued at $118.93B. FANDF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $23.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMWAY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFANDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMWAY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FANDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMWAY and FANDF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMWAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMWAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CMWAY (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.85% price change this week, while FANDF (@Major Banks) price change was -1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.72% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMWAY($119B) has a higher market cap than FANDF($23.1B). CMWAY has higher P/E ratio than FANDF: CMWAY (18.18) vs FANDF (11.12). CMWAY YTD gains are higher at: 17.893 vs. FANDF (4.188). FANDF has less debt than CMWAY: FANDF (20.4B) vs CMWAY (161B). FANDF has higher revenues than CMWAY: FANDF (123B) vs CMWAY (25.8B).
CMWAYFANDFCMWAY / FANDF
Capitalization119B23.1B515%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.8934.188427%
P/E Ratio18.1811.12163%
Revenue25.8B123B21%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt161B20.4B789%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMWAY vs FANDF: Fundamental Ratings
CMWAY
FANDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
693
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
431
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1542
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANDF's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CMWAY (99). This means that FANDF’s stock grew similarly to CMWAY’s over the last 12 months.

CMWAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (31). This means that CMWAY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

FANDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CMWAY (2). This means that FANDF’s stock grew similarly to CMWAY’s over the last 12 months.

CMWAY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (49). This means that CMWAY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMWAY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (42). This means that CMWAY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMWAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QSMRX18.270.02
+0.11%
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style R6
CLBFX34.790.03
+0.09%
American Funds American Balanced 529F
BIAUX25.94N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fdmtl Val Inv
GCSCX17.97N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
MSGUX44.85N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth C

CMWAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMWAY has been closely correlated with NABZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMWAY jumps, then NABZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMWAY
1D Price
Change %
CMWAY100%
-0.48%
NABZY - CMWAY
75%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
ANZGY - CMWAY
71%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
RY - CMWAY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
NTB - CMWAY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
CM - CMWAY
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

FANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FANDF and NAUBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FANDF and NAUBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANDF
1D Price
Change %
FANDF100%
N/A
NAUBF - FANDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMWAY - FANDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
CICHY - FANDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
HBCYF - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
BNDSY - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
More