CMWAY
Price
$97.75
Change
-$4.16 (-4.08%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
MBFJF
Price
$11.04
Change
-$0.87 (-7.30%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CMWAY vs MBFJF

Header iconCMWAY vs MBFJF Comparison
Open Charts CMWAY vs MBFJFBanner chart's image
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Price$97.75
Change-$4.16 (-4.08%)
Volume$15.78K
CapitalizationN/A
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$11.04
Change-$0.87 (-7.30%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
CMWAY vs MBFJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMWAY vs. MBFJF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMWAY is a Hold and MBFJF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CMWAY: $97.75 vs. MBFJF: $11.04)
Brand notoriety: CMWAY and MBFJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMWAY: 92% vs. MBFJF: 37%
Market capitalization -- CMWAY: $118.93B vs. MBFJF: $96.76B
CMWAY [@Major Banks] is valued at $118.93B. MBFJF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $96.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMWAY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMBFJF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMWAY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MBFJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBFJF is a better buy in the long-term than CMWAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMWAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBFJF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMWAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBFJF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBFJF is a better buy in the short-term than CMWAY.

Price Growth

CMWAY (@Major Banks) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while MBFJF (@Major Banks) price change was -6.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-2.12% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMWAY($119B) has a higher market cap than MBFJF($96.8B). CMWAY has higher P/E ratio than MBFJF: CMWAY (18.18) vs MBFJF (11.76). CMWAY YTD gains are higher at: 33.011 vs. MBFJF (30.675). CMWAY has less debt than MBFJF: CMWAY (161B) vs MBFJF (47.28T). MBFJF has higher revenues than CMWAY: MBFJF (6.06T) vs CMWAY (25.8B).
CMWAYMBFJFCMWAY / MBFJF
Capitalization119B96.8B123%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.01130.675108%
P/E Ratio18.1811.76155%
Revenue25.8B6.06T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt161B47.28T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMWAY vs MBFJF: Fundamental Ratings
CMWAY
MBFJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7397
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1110
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2528
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBFJF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMWAY (100). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMWAY’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CMWAY (11). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to CMWAY’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CMWAY (2). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to CMWAY’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CMWAY (45). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to CMWAY’s over the last 12 months.

CMWAY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (28). This means that CMWAY’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMWAYMBFJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLIA20.24-0.07
-0.34%
Franklin International Aggregate Bd ETF
PDBC13.21-0.13
-0.97%
Invesco Optm Yd Dvrs Cdty Stra No K1 ETF
UDN17.65-0.22
-1.23%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bearish
FIVA24.24-0.61
-2.45%
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
NIKL10.62-0.49
-4.41%
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF

CMWAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMWAY has been closely correlated with NABZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMWAY jumps, then NABZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMWAY
1D Price
Change %
CMWAY100%
-4.08%
NABZY - CMWAY
75%
Closely correlated
-3.08%
ANZGY - CMWAY
71%
Closely correlated
-3.16%
RY - CMWAY
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
NTB - CMWAY
45%
Loosely correlated
-4.26%
CM - CMWAY
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
More

MBFJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBFJF and MUFG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBFJF and MUFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBFJF
1D Price
Change %
MBFJF100%
-7.32%
MUFG - MBFJF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
SMFG - MBFJF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
BBVXF - MBFJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHY - MBFJF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
CMWAY - MBFJF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
More