CNDCF
Price
$9.12
Change
+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
351.64M
FFXXF
Price
$2.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
216.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNDCF vs FFXXF

Header iconCNDCF vs FFXXF Comparison
Open Charts CNDCF vs FFXXFBanner chart's image
Canadian Banc
Price$9.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization351.64M
HELIOS FAIRFAX PARTNERS
Price$2.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.93K
Capitalization216.58M
CNDCF vs FFXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNDCF vs. FFXXF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNDCF is a Buy and FFXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CNDCF: $9.12 vs. FFXXF: $2.01)
Brand notoriety: CNDCF and FFXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNDCF: 43% vs. FFXXF: 368%
Market capitalization -- CNDCF: $351.64M vs. FFXXF: $216.58M
CNDCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $351.64M. FFXXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $216.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNDCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNDCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNDCF is a better buy in the long-term than FFXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNDCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFXXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNDCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FFXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFXXF is a better buy in the short-term than CNDCF.

Price Growth

CNDCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while FFXXF (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.96% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNDCF($352M) has a higher market cap than FFXXF($217M). CNDCF YTD gains are higher at: 17.677 vs. FFXXF (-1.471). CNDCF has higher revenues than FFXXF: CNDCF (137M) vs FFXXF (-18.31M).
CNDCFFFXXFCNDCF / FFXXF
Capitalization352M217M162%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.677-1.471-1,202%
P/E Ratio3.64N/A-
Revenue137M-18.31M-748%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A461K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNDCF vs FFXXF: Fundamental Ratings
CNDCF
FFXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
3393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4584
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7849
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1844

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNDCF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFXXF (75). This means that CNDCF’s stock grew significantly faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CNDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXXF (100). This means that CNDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CNDCF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXXF (93). This means that CNDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CNDCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXXF (84). This means that CNDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXXF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CNDCF (78). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to CNDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNDCFFFXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNEMX22.820.11
+0.48%
JPMorgan International Equity R6
LFGTX42.460.09
+0.21%
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R5
THOCX43.19-0.04
-0.09%
Thornburg Global Opportunities C
EWMCX39.86-0.05
-0.13%
Evercore Equity
CMIRX8.90-0.07
-0.78%
Conestoga Discovery Institutional

CNDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNDCF and EQBBF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNDCF and EQBBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNDCF
1D Price
Change %
CNDCF100%
N/A
EQBBF - CNDCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYMBF - CNDCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXXF - CNDCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESIFF - CNDCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEVIY - CNDCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FFXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXXF and CNDCF have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXXF and CNDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXXF
1D Price
Change %
FFXXF100%
N/A
CNDCF - FFXXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEVIY - FFXXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - FFXXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
EQBBF - FFXXF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGLD - FFXXF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
More