Ad is loading...
CNGAX vs RNPFX
CNGAX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CNGAX vs RNPFX
American Funds New Economy 529A
Price$55.56
Change+$4.80 (+9.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.01B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$58.62
Change+$4.27 (+7.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.54B
CNGAX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNGAX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNGAX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. CNGAX (30B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CNGAX: RNPFX (0.84) vs CNGAX (0.00). CNGAX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CNGAX (23 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CNGAX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). CNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). CNGAX (250) and RNPFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.44 vs. CNGAX (-13.82). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.03 vs. CNGAX (28.70).
| CNGAX | RNPFX | CNGAX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.46 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.46 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.569 | -12.395 | 126% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30B | 123B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.82 | -9.44 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.37 | -5.29 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.70 | 37.03 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.45 | 43.41 | 77% |