CNIKF
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
136.95M
YORKF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
8.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNIKF vs YORKF

Header iconCNIKF vs YORKF Comparison
Open Charts CNIKF vs YORKFBanner chart's image
Canada Nickel
Price$0.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.43K
Capitalization136.95M
York Harbour Metals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$21.22K
Capitalization8.53M
CNIKF vs YORKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNIKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YORKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNIKF vs. YORKF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNIKF is a StrongBuy and YORKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CNIKF: $0.61 vs. YORKF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: CNIKF and YORKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNIKF: 35% vs. YORKF: 382%
Market capitalization -- CNIKF: $136.95M vs. YORKF: $8.53M
CNIKF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $136.95M. YORKF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $8.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNIKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYORKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNIKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YORKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CNIKF and YORKF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNIKF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YORKF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNIKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • YORKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNIKF is a better buy in the short-term than YORKF.

Price Growth

CNIKF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while YORKF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -25.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNIKF($137M) has a higher market cap than YORKF($8.53M). YORKF YTD gains are higher at: -2.736 vs. CNIKF (-4.232). CNIKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.24M vs. YORKF (-4.18M). CNIKF has more cash in the bank: 14.8M vs. YORKF (1.86M). YORKF has less debt than CNIKF: YORKF (4.29K) vs CNIKF (232K). CNIKF (0) and YORKF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CNIKFYORKFCNIKF / YORKF
Capitalization137M8.53M1,606%
EBITDA-3.24M-4.18M77%
Gain YTD-4.232-2.736155%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash14.8M1.86M794%
Total Debt232K4.29K5,414%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNIKFYORKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNIKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YORKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLF11.440.53
+4.86%
Cleveland-Cliffs
BP32.200.07
+0.22%
BP plc
DBD57.59-0.19
-0.33%
Diebold Nixdorf
VNDA4.74-0.05
-1.04%
Vanda Pharmaceuticals
NCSM30.21-0.52
-1.70%
NCS Multistage Holdings

CNIKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNIKF and ERO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNIKF and ERO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNIKF
1D Price
Change %
CNIKF100%
+0.16%
ERO - CNIKF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
AUEEF - CNIKF
25%
Poorly correlated
+26.25%
HBM - CNIKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
IE - CNIKF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
NMG - CNIKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
More

YORKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YORKF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YORKF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YORKF
1D Price
Change %
YORKF100%
N/A
DCNNF - YORKF
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
CNIKF - YORKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
RIGMF - YORKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUMF - YORKF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
SRHYY - YORKF
20%
Poorly correlated
-10.69%
More