CNNE
Price
$19.47
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
54 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$98.99
Change
-$0.02 (-0.02%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.98B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNNE vs SHAK

Header iconCNNE vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts CNNE vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Cannae Holdings
Price$19.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$902.38K
Capitalization1.14B
Shake Shack
Price$98.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
Volume$1.35M
Capitalization3.98B
CNNE vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNNE vs. SHAK commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNNE is a StrongBuy and SHAK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CNNE: $19.47 vs. SHAK: $98.99)
Brand notoriety: CNNE: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNNE: 123% vs. SHAK: 91%
Market capitalization -- CNNE: $1.14B vs. SHAK: $3.98B
CNNE [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.14B. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $3.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $216.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNNE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNNE is a better buy in the long-term than SHAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNNE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNNE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the short-term than CNNE.

Price Growth

CNNE (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.66% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was +1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNNE is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($3.99B) has a higher market cap than CNNE($1.14B). CNNE YTD gains are higher at: 0.151 vs. SHAK (-23.737). SHAK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. CNNE (-168.3M). CNNE has less debt than SHAK: CNNE (313M) vs SHAK (838M). SHAK has higher revenues than CNNE: SHAK (1.32B) vs CNNE (437M).
CNNESHAKCNNE / SHAK
Capitalization1.14B3.99B29%
EBITDA-168.3M137M-123%
Gain YTD0.151-23.737-1%
P/E RatioN/A210.62-
Revenue437M1.32B33%
Total CashN/A337M-
Total Debt313M838M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNNE vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
CNNE
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2354
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9687
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
622
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNNE's Valuation (21) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHAK (97) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CNNE’s stock grew significantly faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNNE (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNNE’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's SMR Rating (87) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CNNE (96) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to CNNE’s over the last 12 months.

CNNE's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SHAK (63) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CNNE’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

CNNE's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SHAK (22) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CNNE’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNNESHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFRHX62.98N/A
N/A
MFS Research R3
JPGSX100.32N/A
N/A
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity I
RYAWX115.47N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth H
JYEBX12.31N/A
N/A
JHancock Real Estate Securities A
SFMRX43.50-0.03
-0.07%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R6

CNNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNNE has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNNE jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNNE
1D Price
Change %
CNNE100%
N/A
FRSH - CNNE
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
CAKE - CNNE
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
STKS - CNNE
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.26%
BJRI - CNNE
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
KRUS - CNNE
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
-0.02%
CAKE - SHAK
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
FRSH - SHAK
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
EAT - SHAK
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
TXRH - SHAK
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
CAVA - SHAK
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
More