CNO
Price
$39.05
Change
+$0.53 (+1.38%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.73B
54 days until earnings call
GL
Price
$142.70
Change
+$1.84 (+1.31%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.54B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNO vs GL

Header iconCNO vs GL Comparison
Open Charts CNO vs GLBanner chart's image
CNO Financial Group
Price$39.05
Change+$0.53 (+1.38%)
Volume$6.07K
Capitalization3.73B
Globe Life
Price$142.70
Change+$1.84 (+1.31%)
Volume$4.75K
Capitalization11.54B
CNO vs GL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNO vs. GL commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNO is a Buy and GL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CNO: $38.52 vs. GL: $140.86)
Brand notoriety: CNO and GL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNO: 108% vs. GL: 89%
Market capitalization -- CNO: $3.73B vs. GL: $11.54B
CNO [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.73B. GL’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $11.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $139.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $25.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNO is a better buy in the long-term than GL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the short-term than CNO.

Price Growth

CNO (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while GL (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNO is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

GL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.33% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GL($11.5B) has a higher market cap than CNO($3.73B). CNO has higher P/E ratio than GL: CNO (13.91) vs GL (11.27). GL YTD gains are higher at: 27.124 vs. CNO (4.858). GL has less debt than CNO: GL (2.79B) vs CNO (4.13B). GL has higher revenues than CNO: GL (5.87B) vs CNO (4.38B).
CNOGLCNO / GL
Capitalization3.73B11.5B32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.85827.12418%
P/E Ratio13.9111.27123%
Revenue4.38B5.87B75%
Total CashN/A17.7B-
Total Debt4.13B2.79B148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNO vs GL: Fundamental Ratings
CNO
GL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7789
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1553
SMR RATING
1..100
9586
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5119
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1431
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNO's Valuation (48) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GL (82) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew somewhat faster than GL’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GL (53) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew somewhat faster than GL’s over the last 12 months.

GL's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CNO (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to CNO’s over the last 12 months.

GL's Price Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as CNO (51) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to CNO’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GL (31) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCRB49.830.04
+0.08%
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF
LYLD27.44N/A
N/A
Cambria LargeCap Shareholder Yield ETF
ITDF36.49N/A
-0.01%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF
DIVZ36.24-0.09
-0.25%
Opal Dividend Income ETF
FLCC31.99-0.13
-0.40%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF

CNO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNO has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNO jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNO
1D Price
Change %
CNO100%
-2.23%
PRU - CNO
82%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
MET - CNO
81%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
PRI - CNO
81%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
LNC - CNO
80%
Closely correlated
-4.39%
JXN - CNO
79%
Closely correlated
-3.04%
More