CNO
Price
$52.60
Change
-$0.48 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.91B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MET
Price
$92.54
Change
-$0.73 (-0.78%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
59.54B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNO vs MET

CNO vs MET Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CNO Financial Group (CNO) vs. MetLife (MET) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CNO Financial Group and MetLife both operate in the U.S. insurance sector but differ sharply in scale, with MetLife's market capitalization approximately 12 times larger than CNO's.
  • CNO has delivered stronger recent price momentum — its 52-week gain of roughly 44% outpaces MetLife's approximately 25% return over the same period, though both have outperformed the broader market.
  • MetLife offers a notably higher dividend yield near 2.5% compared to CNO's approximately 1.3%, potentially appealing to income-oriented investors.
  • CNO's forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 9.7 sits below MetLife's roughly 10.3, suggesting a slightly lower valuation on a forward basis despite CNO's recent outperformance.
  • Both companies face comparable macroeconomic headwinds and tailwinds — interest rate sensitivity, demographic shifts, and regulatory developments — but their divergent geographic footprints and product mixes create distinct risk-return profiles.
  • Analyst consensus on MetLife remains broadly positive with a "Moderate Buy" rating and an average price target near $99, while CNO's focused middle-market strategy has driven 14 consecutive quarters of insurance sales growth.

Introduction

Insurance stocks often fly under the radar in equity markets dominated by technology headlines, yet the sector harbors significant value and growth opportunities. CNO Financial Group and MetLife represent two distinct approaches to the insurance business — one a focused middle-market specialist, the other a global financial services powerhouse. This stock comparison examines how these two insurers stack up across key dimensions including recent performance, growth trajectory, risk factors, and market positioning. For traders and investors evaluating exposure to the financial sector, understanding the trade-offs between a nimble domestic player and a diversified international giant offers valuable context for portfolio decision-making.

CNO Overview and Recent Performance

CNO Financial Group, headquartered in Carmel, Indiana, is a mid-cap life and health insurer dedicated exclusively to serving middle-income Americans. Operating through its Consumer and Worksite Divisions under brands including Bankers Life, Colonial Penn, Optavise, and Washington National, the company manages roughly 3.2 million policies and approximately $37 billion in total assets. CNO's distribution model relies on a blend of exclusive agents, independent partners, and direct-to-consumer digital channels.

In recent market activity, CNO shares have demonstrated notable strength, posting a 52-week gain of approximately 44% and trading near all-time highs. The stock's year-to-date advance of roughly 27% has outpaced the S&P 500 by a wide margin. This performance has been supported by solid operational momentum — the company notched its 14th consecutive quarter of insurance sales growth, with total new annualized premiums (NAP, measuring the annualized value of new policy sales) rising 15% for the full year 2025. A strategic partnership with Janus Henderson and Victory Park Capital, in which CNO committed at least $600 million to private asset-backed credit strategies, has further diversified its investment portfolio. The company also streamlined operations by exiting its underperforming fee services business, a move expected to improve annual pre-tax income. CNO carries a beta of 0.82, indicating relatively moderate sensitivity to broader market swings.

MET Overview and Recent Performance

MetLife, Inc., based in New York City, ranks among the world's largest insurance and financial services companies with a market capitalization exceeding $60 billion. The company operates across five segments — U.S., Asia, Latin America, Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA), and MetLife Holdings — providing life insurance, annuities, employee benefits, and retirement solutions to both individual and institutional customers globally. With total assets of approximately $743 billion, MetLife's scale and geographic diversification set it apart from most industry peers.

In recent weeks, MetLife shares have also shown positive momentum, climbing roughly 21% year-to-date and approximately 25% over the trailing twelve months. The stock has been trading in the low-$90s, near its 52-week high. First-quarter 2026 earnings per share (EPS) of $2.42 beat consensus estimates, while adjusted earnings grew 18% year-over-year. The company raised its common dividend by 4.4%, reinforcing a track record of shareholder returns. Analysts have responded favorably — Mizuho, Wells Fargo, and Evercore have all raised price targets in recent weeks, with the consensus landing near $99. MetLife's return on equity (ROE), a gauge of profitability relative to shareholder capital, reached approximately 13% on a trailing twelve-month basis. The stock's beta of 0.78 signals slightly lower volatility relative to the broader market than CNO.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking data-driven insights beyond traditional fundamental analysis, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots covering thousands of tickers, but only top performers with proven statistical track records and strategies suited to the current environment earn placement in this featured section. These bots span diverse trading styles — from swing trading to momentum strategies — across multiple timeframes and asset classes. Some bots in the marketplace have demonstrated annualized returns exceeding 40%, while others emphasize risk-adjusted metrics such as Sharpe ratios above 1.5 or win rates surpassing 65%. Each bot publishes transparent performance statistics, including cumulative returns, drawdown levels, and trade frequency, enabling users to match a bot's profile with their own risk tolerance and objectives. Explore the Trending AI Robots section to discover which strategies the algorithms favor in the current market landscape.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing CNO and MetLife side by side, several structural contrasts emerge. Scale is the most obvious differentiator: MetLife's roughly $60 billion market cap and $743 billion asset base dwarf CNO's approximately $5 billion market cap and $37 billion in total assets. This scale grants MetLife advantages in capital access, brand recognition, and geographic diversification — particularly exposure to faster-growing Asian markets. CNO, however, benefits from an undiluted focus on the underserved U.S. middle-income demographic, where demographic tailwinds — including the aging of over 4 million Americans turning 65 each year — create sustained demand for its Medicare Supplement health insurance and retirement products.

On valuation, CNO's forward P/E of roughly 9.7 sits below MetLife's roughly 10.3, though MetLife's price-to-earnings-growth (PEG) ratio of 0.50 suggests a more attractive growth-adjusted valuation. Income investors may favor MetLife's approximately 2.5% dividend yield over CNO's roughly 1.3%. In terms of recent momentum, CNO has the edge with stronger trailing returns, though MetLife's rising analyst sentiment signals institutional confidence. Risk profiles also differ: CNO's concentrated middle-market exposure creates sensitivity to U.S. consumer health and Medicare policy, while MetLife's global footprint introduces currency risk and exposure to varied regulatory regimes across Asia, Latin America, and EMEA.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative positioning, and catalyst strength, Tickeron's AI analysis would likely tilt toward CNO in the current market environment. The stock's sustained price momentum — trading near all-time highs with a 44% 52-week return — reflects strong trend consistency that quantitative models typically favor. CNO's narrower focus and clearer near-term catalysts, including the ongoing ROE improvement program targeting 200 basis points of expansion through 2027 and the recent strategic partnership in private credit, create a concentrated, measurable growth narrative. That said, MetLife presents a more stable, diversified profile with a superior dividend yield and broader analyst support. An AI-driven framework would likely recognize both stocks as positioned for continued positive performance, while giving a marginal probability edge to CNO based on trend strength, valuation relativity, and identifiable operational catalysts within its focused market niche.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CNO vs. MET commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNO is a Hold and MET is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CNO: $52.60 vs. MET: $92.54)
Brand notoriety: CNO: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNO: 99% vs. MET: 96%
Market capitalization -- CNO: $4.91B vs. MET: $59.54B
CNO [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $4.91B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $59.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $19.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CNO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than CNO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CNO and MET are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CNO (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -1.70% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNO is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

MET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-3.85% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($59.5B) has a higher market cap than CNO($4.91B). CNO has higher P/E ratio than MET: CNO (21.21) vs MET (17.90). CNO YTD gains are higher at: 24.827 vs. MET (18.972). CNO has less debt than MET: CNO (4.3B) vs MET (21.1B). MET has higher revenues than CNO: MET (76B) vs CNO (4.51B).
CNOMETCNO / MET
Capitalization4.91B59.5B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.82718.972131%
P/E Ratio21.2117.90118%
Revenue4.51B76B6%
Total CashN/A121B-
Total Debt4.3B21.1B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNO vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
CNO
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7631
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
529
SMR RATING
1..100
8896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4013
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1420
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (36) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as CNO (57). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to CNO’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (29). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's SMR Rating (88) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (96). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as CNO (40). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to CNO’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (20). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEP134.921.85
+1.39%
American Electric Power Company
GENC15.07-0.15
-0.99%
Gencor Industries
WFG66.70-0.71
-1.05%
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd
GOLD39.53-0.68
-1.69%
Gold.com Inc.
LPCN2.19-0.04
-1.79%
Lipocine

CNO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNO has been closely correlated with JXN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNO jumps, then JXN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNO
1D Price
Change %
CNO100%
-0.90%
JXN - CNO
66%
Closely correlated
-6.04%
MET - CNO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
PRU - CNO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
LNC - CNO
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
GNW - CNO
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
-0.78%
PRU - MET
72%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
LNC - MET
72%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
CNO - MET
66%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
JXN - MET
62%
Loosely correlated
-6.04%
PRI - MET
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More